Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 52 total)
Jeff,
Brilliant solution.......is there a way to perform similar set-based magic in select statements - without using a temp table or joining to a counter table - I can't tell you...
February 14, 2007 at 10:46 am
Greg,
The query failed when I tried to run it agaist one of our smaller client DBs -
Server: Msg 510, Level 16, State 2, Line 1
Cannot create a worktable row...
January 19, 2007 at 10:59 am
I know you are looking for a free tool - but SQL Compare is still worth serious consideration - the cost is nominal and the product is fast and reliable. ...
January 18, 2007 at 10:07 am
Steve,
Sorry but I don't know - the servers are all outsourced to a large third-party - fortunately I have been able to at least retain sa rights on DEV and...
November 24, 2006 at 12:44 pm
Rudy,
Question - why are you recommending 10K disks for data and 15K for logs - we upgraded our data disks to 15K and noticed a substantial performance increase?
Regards,
Harley
October 18, 2006 at 2:57 pm
Peter,
Great idea - I did notice that it doesn't catch those instances where there is more than 1 consecutive number misssing in the sequence.
-- prepare test data
declare @bill table...
August 21, 2006 at 5:40 pm
SQL Compare from Red Gate - fast and very easy to use!
July 25, 2006 at 9:51 am
I have used the Redgate and Embaradero tools - the functionality was similar but I was very impressed with the speed of the Redgate tool - it ran a compare on...
May 5, 2006 at 9:51 am
Dave,
The application I inherited is very much the same - views referencing views which are built on more views - the typical view joins together 20 tables when you drill all...
May 1, 2006 at 3:53 pm
When I try to run this query I get the following error:
Server: Msg 195, Level 15, State 10, Line 1
'SCHEMA_NAME' is not a recognized function name.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Harley
April 28, 2006 at 5:00 pm
Here is a list of the counters we monitor - we collect the data every 5 minutes to a spreadsheet - as you watch them over...
April 24, 2006 at 10:50 am
The results don't agree??? One query says SP3 - the other SP4??? We appear to be a level in between the levels noted in the chart that was posted:
RTM ...
April 11, 2006 at 4:26 pm
Thanks for all the well-considered responses - a lot of ideas to digest.
Regards,
Harley
April 11, 2006 at 3:02 pm
Thanks for all of the thoughful responses......
In answer to some of the the thoughts,
>Statistics are updated nightly based on 20% selection.
>We just ran dbcc reindex on all the tables...
April 10, 2006 at 4:10 pm
Andrew,
Thanks for the response and the links!
Harley
March 28, 2006 at 5:42 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 52 total)