Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 103 total)
Mark,
Could you post your code again?
GAJ
June 17, 2008 at 10:41 am
Hi Michael,
I'm not sure of the performance hit of the udf, I'd have to test the various query plans, etc.
The maintenace issue is what I'd want to stay away from...
June 16, 2008 at 8:31 am
Alex,
I wish I had known of this feature 2 years ago but it's one I missed until recently. My hope is that there are others out there that had been...
June 16, 2008 at 7:02 am
Nicely Put RBarry.
I would start a performance audit prior to meeting (if possible).
Go into the meeting with as much knowledge as possible:
http://www.sql-server-performance.com/articles/per/performance_audit_part3_p1.aspx
Dont assume that the engineers are right...
May 19, 2008 at 3:46 pm
Exactly what I was thinking.
some IO concurrency issues....
gaj
May 12, 2008 at 6:13 pm
could even be the Transaction logs being backed up or something.
are your Transaction Logs on different disks than your data\indexes ?
same thing with TempDB. is it on it's own logical...
May 12, 2008 at 4:14 pm
check to see if the select is being blocked.
as a quick test add WITH (NOLOCK) hint on the Table
Then, when the query runs, look at IO Performance in PerfMon
I would...
May 12, 2008 at 4:10 pm
Great Article !!!
I am very much looking fwd to Part II.
thanks
Greg Jackson
PDX, Oregon
March 26, 2008 at 9:50 am
I would just execute the statement in question 5-10 times while profiling it for duration.
run it 5-10 times without qualified naming and then 5-10 times with qualified names.
average the durations
probably...
March 10, 2008 at 8:13 am
Roy,
Nice Work !
This is a well written, clear article.
I've always known this to be an issue, and in many places I've worked, we've adamantly forced the qualified naming conventions.
In the...
March 10, 2008 at 7:48 am
LOL
sounds to me like they had some "Issues" with the past DBA that they are replacing.
yeah...I dont see too many GURU's pounding their doors down here....
March 6, 2008 at 5:10 pm
I also am not fond of the idea.
Putting the SQL layer in the hands of the entire engineering arm is likely to be dangerous in most shops.
How can you guarantee...
March 6, 2008 at 5:08 pm
Sorry Michaell,
I dont understand the question here...
GAJ
March 6, 2008 at 3:53 am
Rishi,
You're very welcome.
I never imagined this trivial little article would have generated so much interest and such a vigorous discussion thread.
I'm very glad that SQLServerCentral published the article now.
cheers,
March 5, 2008 at 10:37 am
Thanks a bunch Matt,
I definately will
GAJ
March 4, 2008 at 8:07 am
Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 103 total)