Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
🙂 Hi. Back again. The problem has gone away, but it doesnt make sense.
To remind you all, and me, the query was either "select [specific fields]" or "select *"...
September 29, 2006 at 11:53 am
So... I am not crazy. Okay, well, at least on this subject.
Disk fragmentation is low, thanks to...
September 25, 2006 at 3:10 pm
Even more !
The entire execution time subtree cost for * is .0130; for the distinct it is 0.0123. Yet the relative execution times are 360...
September 25, 2006 at 1:20 pm
Okay. I did both options preceding each query, with the same basic results. The version with explicit fields took 10 min, while the other too seconds to 2 minutes.
[I also...
September 25, 2006 at 1:04 pm
Not explicitly. I tested them in separate sessions. May I ask for syntax to do that?
September 25, 2006 at 11:58 am
Really late to the game. But my first thought was "Nice Software Stephanie" (Short Circuit: which one other has identified as well) ... followed closely by WarGames and Tron and...
December 7, 2005 at 3:54 pm
To get parms back from a sproc, requires the OUTPUT keyword, which must be in the proc declaration, as well as the execution. Like so...
create procedure Proc1 @parm1 varchar(10) =...
September 19, 2005 at 3:39 pm
Noel gave you the essence. One additional feature I am using more and more lately is the Return Code. Here is an example...
create procedure proc1 as
-- do some calculation
-- if...
September 19, 2005 at 1:20 pm
Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)