Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
Hi Wayne,
Its pretty late over here so I haven't had a chance to test for total accuracy but after running your code it seems to work really well ! However,...
February 8, 2005 at 4:17 pm
You little beauty - that was it - my brain was on strike
Thanks for the speedy reply - very much appreciated indeed.
Regards.
February 6, 2005 at 2:39 pm
Hi and many thanks for your reply.
>but does not check if the PkOutRec has already been assigned, because it is not clear >if you want the "already Assigned" check to...
February 4, 2005 at 12:19 am
Hi Jeff
Thanks for your reply, which makes the position perfectly clear to me now. I really appreciate you taking the time and trouble to respond in this way.
Best regads,
December 28, 2004 at 5:05 am
Hi Jeff
>Then you already know that using @@IDENTITY in the presence of triggers is "death by SQL"
Nope, I didn't know that. Care to elaborate?
Thanks.
December 27, 2004 at 4:34 am
The main issue is not how to identify the last PK value but how to return it to the calling procedure without using an output parameter.
Thanks.
December 23, 2004 at 11:41 am
Thanks for this advice - it has really helped!
December 22, 2004 at 11:05 pm
Hi Journeyman
Thanks for replying.
>Do you have any indexes on the 90 column "big" table?
There is the PK and an FK that points back to the parent table.
>Personally I would...
September 18, 2004 at 11:44 am
Hey Journeyman, that's an *excellent* tip. I just used it now and ran the script from QA. What a great learning tool that is.
Thanks for that - I hadn't ever...
September 17, 2004 at 12:48 pm
OK Allen, thanks for the advice ! Its appreciated.
September 17, 2004 at 9:54 am
What, even when the clustered index is not on the PK ?
September 17, 2004 at 9:44 am
Thanks for this information. I will give some serious consideration to your suggestions.
September 16, 2004 at 1:36 pm
That makes perfect sense in the context in which I have seen this kind of notation.
Thanks!
August 17, 2004 at 5:40 am
Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)