Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 461 total)
No unfortunatly only on OLTP.
But on OLTP you can even use a so called distributed partitioned views where you can distribute your data betwenn several servers completly transparently to the...
August 1, 2003 at 2:20 am
For shure!
I'm running several SAP systems for over 2 years now!
My database size is over 150 GB and I have 1300 user connected to. The average transaction response time is...
August 1, 2003 at 2:17 am
Shure.
Have a look in the BOL under "Creating a Partitioned View"
It's easy if you have SQL2K Ent. Edition
July 31, 2003 at 9:51 am
It would be very useful.
I personally would put an extension to the insert command like "WITH UPDATEEXISTING"
Same for the BCP or DTS and bulk insert.
I think the biggest help could...
July 28, 2003 at 5:47 am
The optimal environment is if you have plenty of disks to put the system, tempdb, logs, data and indexes on different physical disk arrays. you could even partition your data...
July 24, 2003 at 3:11 am
I've got the same type of problem.
To solve this problemI had to put into the PATH environment variable the path of the SQLServer binaries C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL\Binn
July 24, 2003 at 3:02 am
As of today I would definitly not recommend storing image files on the DB.
Storing those files will be much faster and you will use much less ressources then storing them...
July 23, 2003 at 10:23 am
Why not to use simply the sp_spaceused system stored procedure eventually together with the sp_MSforeachdb proc?
June 5, 2003 at 5:22 am
Why not to use a partinioned view?
If you are putting new records once per month a new table/month could be good candidate. So you could keep the insert and update...
March 17, 2003 at 3:23 am
Tomiz,
Just to speed up your queries you could considere to put the text column on a different filegroup which is on a separate physical disk with the TEXTIMAGE_ON filegroup clause...
March 14, 2003 at 10:28 am
Of course you could think about splitting table horizontally and vertically.
If you have tables with too many columns you could try too split them b yfrequently used and less frequently...
March 14, 2003 at 10:25 am
I will put my 2 cents here too:
I'm supporting actually my customers running SQLServer and DB2, in the past I was running Oracly and Sybase too.
My opinion:
System: SS was made...
March 14, 2003 at 10:16 am
Just some words of clarification:
quote:
mromm wrote:A constraint is added to the column definition like this:
CREATE TABLE table_name (
abc int NOT NULL...
March 14, 2003 at 9:49 am
Yes I did mention the xp so 13 thread ahead .
I've just called it a DLL because an xp is in fact a dll which has to...
March 14, 2003 at 9:27 am
Brandon,
I still belive that this is the wrong way you go by doing as you have written (remove comments, table, sp names...) (bonjour la maintenance! )
The same...
March 7, 2003 at 12:06 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 461 total)