Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 417 total)
Jack,
I'll ttry a smaller filesize, I used 50 Mb.
The other way is crude but simple: I scripted the trace and ran it in a job. Had to stop the trace...
June 5, 2009 at 6:06 am
Hi Kruti,
There is no inner SELECT, the statement is as I have given. There are some more columns, but that is not important, only the SELECT COUNT(1) is executed. The...
June 5, 2009 at 5:54 am
Jack, I run profiler on my local pc with WXP, servers are W2003 EE with SQL2K5 SE. I believe it to be the known bug existing in SQL2K; if I...
June 4, 2009 at 7:32 am
Ah, it is, but not in a format I expected: OS maximum instead of a fixed number.
Tnx.
June 4, 2009 at 5:36 am
Sorry for the delay.
There is no WSRM in use; max degree of parallelism is set to 0, meaning it will use all 8 CPU's.
We're checking things out and hopefully monday...
June 3, 2009 at 6:49 am
Hi Florian,
Worked like a charm, tnx!
I always thought those arrows had something to do with direction...:hehe:
June 3, 2009 at 6:42 am
Tnx.
Found some similar stuff myself, but your's more detailed & extended.
Tnx again.
June 3, 2009 at 6:23 am
easyest way is to use sql server profiler.
Create your trace with all filters (db) you want and script it.
Then launch it in a startup job or procedure.
Got that part, but...
June 3, 2009 at 5:18 am
Very educational article. Lately I have to deal with performance issues created by similar queries as given in this article. I like to read more about subqueries and their alternatives....
June 2, 2009 at 3:00 am
Tnx for answering all. Found out about SQLPERF already, but tnx anyways.
May 30, 2009 at 12:46 pm
Tnx Sunny, works like a charm, and it's a better solution then what I had in mind.
Still I would like to know what I should select in Profiler to get...
May 29, 2009 at 7:21 am
Hi Florian,
I will try this monday, when I'm back at work. Exactly on the icon. Got it.
Tnx
May 21, 2009 at 2:38 am
Hi Alz,
The server is a dedicated SQLServer box. Can't check on WSRM, it's a long holidayweekend here in the Netherlands. I'll check monday.
May 21, 2009 at 2:26 am
Hi ALZDBA,
I considered some of the things you mentioned. The strange thing is, these 2 CPU are constantly (much) higher then the other cpu's. They follow the same frequencywave as...
May 20, 2009 at 6:13 am
Florian,
I checked all these items and no, there was nothing indicating why this behaveour occurred. SQL Server can use all 8 CPU's.
Tnx for answering.
May 20, 2009 at 2:28 am
Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 417 total)