Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 193 total)
Hi Robert, sure you can, I have updated version of it, not sure why the old one is posted. I'll attach it soon
October 23, 2015 at 8:06 am
use a server side trace and save to file.
October 13, 2015 at 10:30 am
There is a job that executes sys.sp_dbmmonitorupdate every minute.
September 30, 2015 at 7:44 am
Brandie Tarvin (9/30/2015)
...Are you using the monitoring tables for anything? Do you have jobs set up that reference them?
After I read this statement i realized that another DBA decided to...
September 30, 2015 at 7:36 am
Kristen-173977 (9/29/2015)
So if you don't have a performance problem yet then you could easily in the future, at which time the fix would be very expensive to retro fit. ...
September 30, 2015 at 2:11 am
Alan.B (9/29/2015)
Wouldn't it be better to have at least separate stored procedure to use in all those different places but only returning columns that they actually need or maybe replace...
September 30, 2015 at 2:06 am
vedau (9/27/2015)
Doing an index maintenance right after the FULL could reduce the size of the Diff backup.
I think what you are trying to say is doing maintenance just BEFORE the...
September 28, 2015 at 3:28 am
The statistics are about the same for both cases. I was actually testing it quite deeply last week as i wasn't sure if CAST(logdate AS date) = '20150911' is a...
September 16, 2015 at 9:49 am
Yes but if i won't specify a thing it will be FORWARD_ONLY DYNAMIC?
September 11, 2015 at 8:40 am
I was reading https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms180169%28v=sql.110%29.aspx
and was trying to find out what is the default behavior but it only says that:
If FORWARD_ONLY is specified without the STATIC, KEYSET, or DYNAMIC keywords,...
September 11, 2015 at 2:27 am
Thays what I was expecting. Thanks for the explanation Luis
September 10, 2015 at 12:46 pm
Luis Cazares (9/10/2015)
Change the FAST_FORWARD option to FORWARD_ONLY STATIC.
Thanks Louis, that solves the problem. Just got a bit confused whit this behavior.
September 10, 2015 at 11:28 am
Luis Cazares (9/4/2015)
Emil B (9/4/2015)
was this ROWS/RANGE "hint" available in 2008/R2?
No, neither the ORDER BY for window functions.
But the Quirky Update is supposed to be even faster. For more information:...
September 4, 2015 at 10:48 am
was this ROWS/RANGE "hint" available in 2008/R2?
also the default behaviour of over without ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING caused a large number of reads on Worktable, after adding it it went...
September 4, 2015 at 10:07 am
Just to let you know the execution time of the stored procedure that was using this part of code reduced from over 13 minutes to 3 seconds
September 4, 2015 at 5:27 am
Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 193 total)