Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 62 total)
I ran into something like this too. I think I solved it by restarting my MSSQLSERVER service. I also had to make sure to install the developer edition of the...
October 10, 2005 at 9:14 am
I agree. I got the question right, but it works with the default settings only. I thought the question would be about the ANSI NULL settings, obviously that affects the...
October 4, 2005 at 8:16 am
Cool! We can comment on how bad/poorly worded/poorly edited the questions are before they're published!
September 21, 2005 at 2:56 pm
This refers to database mirroring, which is not going to be a part of SQL 2k5 release.
September 21, 2005 at 2:50 pm
This was fixed in SP4, at least for me.
September 21, 2005 at 1:39 pm
sp_defaultdb [ @loginame = ] 'login' ,
[ @defdb = ] 'database'
HTH
September 20, 2005 at 12:51 pm
Someone needs to edit these questions and answers. This is the third time in recent weeks that the answer has been incorrect. Especially the backup questions seem to be mixed...
September 16, 2005 at 9:11 am
That was my conclusion also. Since I didn't see 7 as an option I figured 6 was closest. Who worries about the private network? Yes you have to set those...
September 2, 2005 at 8:03 am
If you must get @@version to show > .760, you can install one of the post SP3 hotfixes to get it up to .818 or higher.
September 1, 2005 at 2:13 pm
I don't know specifically why the conflict viewer won't work, but the conflict data is stored in conflict tables in the publication DB. You can check there manually. For example: ...
September 1, 2005 at 1:22 pm
I have found this to be very useful, when dealing with over 300 connections:
sp_who2 'active'
...gives a list of active connections, ones where activity is not 'AWAITING COMMAND'
August 26, 2005 at 1:30 pm
I was thinking of where you suggested:
if Object_id(tempdb..#tempTable)>0...
This will only work in the connection that created the temp table...since he was looking for it in EM I thought I should...
August 26, 2005 at 12:10 pm
Ah, sushila, I missed where you said, run this in tempdb. Some people try looking in the local db.
August 26, 2005 at 12:02 pm
We use merge replication in a similar scenario, though we have many more transactions. It doesn't scale well to our size, about 300 GB of data/indexes. But for smaller situations...
August 26, 2005 at 10:47 am
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 62 total)