Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 211 total)
Good point. That would cause problems with check constraints, defaults, etc too....
So the lesson is stick with an ISO format! Well, I always have anyway.
January 15, 2011 at 9:03 am
Not a clue... but now I'll go find out! Thanks 😀
January 15, 2011 at 8:50 am
HAH! Quite true I suppose. Not a problem you're likely ever to run into though, unless for some reason you decide to develop in a different language for the lulz....
January 15, 2011 at 8:47 am
That's a good idea and one I had only vaguely considered. I'm not sure how I would approach them though. Guess I'll give them a call 🙂
January 15, 2011 at 8:41 am
SQL Server will recognize a lot of date formatted strings. If you declare a date variable you can simply assign to it from one of those correctly formatted string formats....
January 15, 2011 at 8:17 am
Nope all code was written at home during (forced) annual leave. I'm aware that companies are generally (string of ugly words here), so I've covered my bases there. 😉
January 15, 2011 at 6:23 am
Thanks for your feedback. Yep, this is exactly the kind of stuff I'm thinking about.
We are actually using the addin at my place of work with great success. I'm the...
January 15, 2011 at 5:50 am
I would store the ingredients as rows in a separate table, keep the recipe name and instructions in the recipe table. This makes the data model more flexible. As you...
January 15, 2011 at 5:43 am
Cool, I'll point them to your post when they complain 😛
December 6, 2010 at 10:13 pm
It could be a storage related issue, but there are no errors either in the eventlogs or in the checkdb output. I want restarting the sql service to recreate temdb...
December 6, 2010 at 9:55 pm
One thing I forgot to mention: the database the view selects from is in snapshot isolation mode.
December 6, 2010 at 9:09 pm
To reopen this topic briefly, I'm not clear on whether a rebuild is not allowed with a varchar(max) if sp_tableoption has been used to force the data to be stored...
February 24, 2009 at 5:23 pm
Again, yeah, but that's not really the point of the example.
I'd actually argue that it is guaranteed to be unique, depending on how you define "guaranteed". Is it possible...
February 24, 2009 at 5:05 pm
Yep, that's true. I'm just using this as a contrived example.
(IE, that's why it's not *guaranteed* to be an ever increasing key)
February 24, 2009 at 4:12 pm
Yup, I chose to use date (I should have said datetime) as an example specifically for contrivane... ie, one user can't put entries in at the same time, but two...
February 21, 2009 at 12:56 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 211 total)