Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
Yeah, I noticed this "improvement" in 2005, but I couldn't find any documentation as to why this suddenly "works". I haven't taken the time to test other such functions...
August 9, 2011 at 12:36 pm
Thanks to everybody for the quick responses.
Yes, I understand that without a "where" clause there is no guarantee of the row order, but I just thought it was very...
February 3, 2011 at 5:24 am
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (12/6/2010)
December 7, 2010 at 3:11 am
OK, yes, that makes sense. For some reason I thought that each instance had its own copy of the data on its "own" disks...thanks!
October 20, 2010 at 2:38 am
Yeah, you're right about security. The reason I brought it up was that I vaguely remember doing something like this in SQL 2000, but I couldn't find it in 2008....
August 4, 2009 at 12:33 am
Thanks for the link
OK, still a bit confused:
From this link : http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/recomp.mspx#E5D
It says "For example, the query can be submitted under "set showplan_xml on" mode. If the...
July 2, 2008 at 4:03 am
OK, thanks! Btw: you don't know of any type of perf monitor counter that would show this?
July 1, 2008 at 11:42 pm
Thanks all. I actually use a code snippet very similar to the count from inserted/deleted tables.
March 20, 2008 at 2:24 am
OK, thanks to everybody for the quick responses. I guess I was a bit optimistic about the powers of alter index.
October 19, 2007 at 3:29 am
No errors...I did a dbcc indexdefrag and got
pages scanned 7
pages moved 0
pages removed 0
the index is showing frag % = 85,7142857142857
I even dropped and recreated the index and the frag...
October 18, 2007 at 4:42 am
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
This website stores cookies on your computer.
These cookies are used to improve your website experience and provide more personalized services to you, both on this website and through other media.
To find out more about the cookies we use, see our Privacy Policy