Viewing 7 posts - 61 through 67 (of 67 total)
andycao (10/6/2010)
That's how I saw it. Gosh, an ad disguised as a SQL Server Central article. OK, moving on...
I thought I'd explain my position here (as the author)....
October 6, 2010 at 6:50 pm
"I think the article would have been much more effective had it just focused on the product rather than negatively portray people who are trying to do their job diligently."
Actually...
October 6, 2010 at 6:31 pm
My point in using the Indy 500 as an analogy is not to liken all software development to just this one race. Rather it is to point out that Honda...
October 6, 2010 at 9:09 am
OK I have a similar problem but not the same. Two years ago I tried to install SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition. It automatically gave me the Developer Edition so...
December 16, 2008 at 1:20 pm
Stan Hargrove: Rather than convert back to VB, you could also try just choosing some arbitrary table name (real or perhaps even nonexistent) and use that. The CLR might not require the table...
August 4, 2006 at 8:55 am
To everyone complaining about the specifics of the AUDIT table in this article: you are missing the point. It is not my intention to suggest that this is the ideal...
August 4, 2006 at 8:31 am
Stan Hargrove: Thanks for trying out my solution. I don't understand why you had a problem with compilation of the missing Target attribute though. I compiled the code in the article in...
August 4, 2006 at 8:15 am
Viewing 7 posts - 61 through 67 (of 67 total)