Viewing 15 posts - 661 through 675 (of 726 total)
Is there any single column that would work? While I realize the above was just sample data, if you have a single unique column that would work between the two...
June 6, 2006 at 2:11 pm
Untested, but this should work for you:
SELECT
Spanish
,English
FROM
Tbl1
WHERE
NOT EXISTS (
SELECT
1
FROM
Tbl2
WHERE
Tbl1.Spanish = Tbl2.Spanish
AND Tbl1.English = Tbl2.English)
June 6, 2006 at 12:45 pm
Before you go further, if you're not the dba, you really should have them involved, as the possible fixes change system tables.
If it were my box, I'd reapply the service...
June 6, 2006 at 11:28 am
Well, that's a bit problematic.
Are you the dba, and have you had any problems during service pack installs? Is the box one that you could reapply a service pack to,...
June 6, 2006 at 11:09 am
Are you running this from Query Analyzer, or from an app?
I'm a bit confused as to why SQL isn't finding the procedure, unless there was perhaps something like a...
June 6, 2006 at 10:54 am
It should be in your master database under "Extended Stored Procedures" in Enterprise Manager, and I'm pretty sure it should have EXEC privileges set to public.
Can you ensure that it...
June 6, 2006 at 10:42 am
The WHERE clause gets handled after the join, so the second query will only show those rows where the s.qty is greater then 50. The first query should return all...
June 5, 2006 at 6:39 am
Are you asking about just a straight query typed into Query Analyzer, or a stored procedure that will receive passed parameters for the filter?
I'm guessing the latter, in which case I...
June 5, 2006 at 6:12 am
If you know for a fact that they don't have INSERT privileges on the table, but can indeed insert records, another possibility, aside from the Role issue outlined above, is...
June 1, 2006 at 6:04 pm
Are you wanting to convert to or from EPOCH time? Other than leap second handling (which would probably require a small lookup table), it should be pretty easy if you...
June 1, 2006 at 6:23 am
If partitioned views don't meet your needs, then something like the following should work. You'd need to adapt a similar concept for the 12 month, etc. versions, but that should...
May 31, 2006 at 9:06 am
Based on this and the problems you are having in your other posts, I'd guess it's a network connectivity issue, and not a true SQL Server problem.
If the network admins...
May 31, 2006 at 8:24 am
I found a link documenting the problem to give you the official response.
May 31, 2006 at 8:16 am
Viewing 15 posts - 661 through 675 (of 726 total)