Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 726 total)
Peter Larsson (11/6/2007)
That's 381.25 billion records in the table with an insert rate of 5800 records per second.
In case someone tries to imagine the horror of running queries against hundreds...
November 6, 2007 at 2:16 pm
Jeff Moden (11/6/2007)
November 6, 2007 at 11:08 am
I think I see the confusion. That article isn't a highly specific article about the objects called "documenting keys", it's a very broad article about migrating from one version of...
November 6, 2007 at 10:57 am
By the way, this back and forth over the use of "Over()" is kind of silly, when there are a ton of things I like about SQL Server 2005, that...
November 6, 2007 at 10:40 am
Jeff Moden (11/6/2007)
We...
November 6, 2007 at 10:30 am
Jeff Moden (11/5/2007)
November 6, 2007 at 8:51 am
Sergiy (11/5/2007)
Proven a liar.At least.
That's pretty funny. Not even close to true, but funny.
Um, in case you're not aware, the two statements say basically the same thing. If by "liar",...
November 6, 2007 at 8:38 am
Sergiy (11/5/2007)
That you were wrong. No big deal, as I've done it before, and I'll do it again (based on your "maths" skills, probably sooner rather...
November 6, 2007 at 8:33 am
Why don't you link to the article so we can see what it is you are talking about?
"Document key" being comprised of a pk and fk sounds either like something...
November 5, 2007 at 3:42 pm
While they appear to do the same thing on the surface, they are two completely different beasts, and it could take pages to outline every single nuance. They don't even...
November 5, 2007 at 3:34 pm
Keep in mind that while Carl's answers are correct, both terms are used in ambiguous manners quite frequently in the SQL world, especially "work table".
I've seen people refer to tables...
November 5, 2007 at 3:20 pm
I was away for a while, but finally had a chance to log on, so time to clear up some misconceptions that seem to be out there.
Jeff Moden (10/22/2007)[
Ya know......
November 5, 2007 at 3:11 pm
Sergiy (10/22/2007)
No, I pointed out that it was one, 1, uno, einz, a...
October 22, 2007 at 7:59 pm
Jeff Moden (10/22/2007)Funny thing, though... to me (I could be wrong), if you want shear speed without much thought about tuning, it looks like the Inner Join is the winner...
October 22, 2007 at 6:53 pm
Sergiy (10/22/2007)
No.I want to know you version of the difference between table scan and clustered index scan.
Very interesting.
What would you like to know? If you would like some help on...
October 22, 2007 at 6:14 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 726 total)