"No, TR takes 0.1250 as = 0.1250.

Can you provide any proof for this?"

Absolutely, but not really in the mood to do so since you haven't answered any of my...

And you still haven't responded as to whether the above coded issue is your main beef with BR. Until you tell us, I have no clue where you are coming from, and...

No, TR takes 0.1250 as = 0.1250. What it does with it afterwards is based on its rules, and determined by how many digits you want to round to, but...

While none of your five points are actually true, and you haven't provided proof for any of them, I still am willing to give you some credit for that one...

You're going to hate this, but it's likely even deeper, so we'll need the code for CalculateDistance. It's usually caused by functions receiving values they can't handle, such as...

By the way, since I don't actually expect for you to ever back up any of your claims, I decided to continue to code your own stuff for you, as...

Still no proof to back up your absurd claims?

In other words, you have no proof, correct? The closest you've come to meeting any definition of proof that might be tangentially related to anything you've brought forward so far is...

I ran a couple of spot checks myself and come up with the same results as you. I still think Exists is sargable (seems like it would have to be),...

But isn't Exists sargable, while Not Exists isn't? If true, I'd think that Exists would at least situationally be better, while always at least equalling Not Exists performance. If that's...

Are you serious? While we've come to realize that when you say "I conclude", you really mean "I hope I'm right, but am likely wrong", I think ascribing a definition...

Again, prove that TR sees the precise number 0.3333 as all values between 0.3333(0) and 0.3333(9). That's all you need to do.

I can supply to the function 4 digits precise number 0.3333 which (by mathematical model used for TR) represents all values between 0.3333(0) and 0.3333(9). 1/3 is within this range,...

0.(3) is a valid number, appears in a lot of cases, and any function must support it.

You do know that this directly contradicts the statements you earlier made about computers...

This is more stupid than you appear to be. First off, if any programmer actually tried to pass the fraction 1/3 to a function, I'd fire him on the spot....