Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 211 total)
An assembly is written in .Net, so any .Net language would apply. MDX is the "data access language" (much like SQL).
Cases for an assembly vary, and it's still an emerging...
December 18, 2008 at 7:28 am
No need to go the DTSX route (nor is it advisable).
Simply change the threads on your process job to 1, and they'll process one at a time. (Then, you can...
December 17, 2008 at 7:56 am
Most likely, you didn't set the connection for the task.
December 16, 2008 at 3:23 am
You shouldn't be seeing a different performance profile running it via the designer vs running it in batch, so there's something fundamentally different between the two senarios:
- How many threads...
December 16, 2008 at 3:14 am
First, you need to understand that "Actions" are simply "meta concept" in a MSAS cube. There's no "engine" ready and able to execute the action. In a way, it's only...
November 25, 2008 at 3:49 pm
[CandidateInfo].[DaysToScreening] can't have ".Children". It's an attribute, not a member.
NB. Two things:
Take the quotes off the expression definition. You'll then get inline syntax checking from most of he tools.
Don't know...
November 20, 2008 at 7:15 pm
I doubt the asnwer has much to do with the relative mathematical speeds, and more to do with the overall I/O, Network, etc.
In general, I'd expect that overall it would...
November 20, 2008 at 6:54 pm
To help you with the diagnosis, I suggest you post the following information:
The following counts:
- records per dimension
- attributes per dimension
- records in the fact table (or records per partition)
As...
November 7, 2008 at 9:25 am
There's a number of third party design tools which'll reverse engineer your database into a data model and help you start organizing and documenting the design. The problem space is...
November 6, 2008 at 12:10 pm
I'll have to concur with the previous comment that 20 dimensions are "alot". I'd go as far as saying it's huge.
Examine your dimensions, and determine if any of them are...
November 6, 2008 at 11:56 am
Sounds like you're having a problem with your cube design.
Check the Dimension Usage tab. Make sure that the cube has your time reference.
September 26, 2008 at 12:02 pm
Ok, based on that information, that's a hefty cube. 10 Million rows isn a dimension isn't a trivial dimension, plus with 10 dimensions, the calculation space is huge. How many...
September 26, 2008 at 10:44 am
It's hard to tell from your post, exactly what you're trying to accomplish. However, some general guidelines:
a) you need to carefully evaluate the data you're loading into the cube and...
September 25, 2008 at 9:43 am
Check the throughput on your database. In general, is you're not approaching 100% CPU utilization on your MSAS box, you probabaly can do better. Plus, better to separate your MSAS...
September 25, 2008 at 9:34 am
First, yes do the upgrade. There's important fixes in SP2.
Second. You don't mention how big your cubs are. Also, what does your partition and aggregation design look like? (How many...
September 25, 2008 at 8:48 am
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 211 total)