Viewing 15 posts - 346 through 360 (of 378 total)
Oh sorry. Must have hit a sore nerve. Some of us need to not take things so personally. I'll leave the lock out issue to the experts...
June 25, 2003 at 9:50 am
Okay, I think I just found the perfect article for tkc to present to this fellow about ANSI SQL 92 standards and the differences of referential integrity in the MS...
June 25, 2003 at 9:10 am
So, stax68, maybe this guy is an old SQL 7.0 programmer. You might have hit on the whole problem for tkc.
June 25, 2003 at 9:00 am
quote:
what I'm saying about SQL 7 is that it doesn't have native support for cascade operations, unlike (as we know) SQL 8...
June 25, 2003 at 8:59 am
Hey gang, the guy needs documentation, I'm just giving him what he asked for. If you have some documentation to support triggers over foreign keys as opposed to what...
June 25, 2003 at 8:50 am
Here's another one from MSDN (Microsoft Developers Network):
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/architec/8_ar_da_0777.asp
quote:
ConstraintsConstraints allow you to define the way Microsoft® SQL Server™ 2000 automatically enforces the integrity...
June 25, 2003 at 6:11 am
I'm not sure what you are saying about SQL 7:
quote:
...if you want to enforce cascade update/delete operations in SQL 7-, or to...
June 25, 2003 at 6:05 am
My thoughts:
Triggers = Psychic Prediction
Foreign Keys = True Referential Integrity
Whatever happened to those ERDs (for Frank, Entity Relationship Diagrams) and UML (Universal Modeling Language) Class Diagrams? Do they just...
June 24, 2003 at 4:21 pm
Here is an excellent article from DBMS Online that will validate your argument
http://www.dbmsmag.com/9606d17.html
I'm with you. I find triggers to be too loose for enforcing true referential integrity and really...
June 24, 2003 at 1:58 pm
quote:
I'd rather hire someone I like, that fits my team. Can't teach that.
To...
June 24, 2003 at 11:56 am
quote:
If a problem differs from text-book, they stumped. No ability to work things out.
Unfortunately, that...
June 24, 2003 at 7:46 am
Yeah, sure thing, Frank. However, I don't know anymore good acronyms if that's what you're interested in. Ha! Ha! Just kidding!
June 24, 2003 at 7:18 am
Sorry, you have misperceived the intention of my comment. My intention is to get you to understand the importance of backing up the database and...
June 23, 2003 at 10:20 am
quote:
...my NetAdmin didn't have the tape running on that server because he "didn't know" I meant to have that server backed up...
June 23, 2003 at 8:35 am
Well, if you can afford (and well should afford) another server, I definitely AGREE that you should back up to it. Hey, by the way, technically speaking, when you...
June 23, 2003 at 5:19 am
Viewing 15 posts - 346 through 360 (of 378 total)