Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 321 total)
Upon further review...
The primay issue is expected SQL 2000 SP4 behavior according to http://support.microsoft.com/kb/906344.
Thanks, Dave
April 16, 2008 at 10:59 am
Thanks. Sounds like I may have a memory or disk bottleneck. I do see some paging issues so I'll problably add some memory to see if this addressess...
April 15, 2008 at 11:28 pm
I go away on vacation (Disney) for a week and come back to find some good discussions. Thanks everyone for the feedback on this topic.
Any suggestions on what Events to...
April 3, 2008 at 9:03 am
The case sensitivity thing is a new one for me also. I still don't understand why I am getting SP:CacheMiss followed by SP:CacheHit every time I execute a proc....
March 24, 2008 at 2:57 pm
The test proc ran SELECT * FROM TABLE_NAME. That's it.
March 20, 2008 at 2:12 pm
I'll check out the link. Thanks.
I have 2GB reserved for the OS and SQL is configured to use a maximum of 8GB. The pagefile use isn't even 1%...
March 19, 2008 at 2:35 pm
Run DBCC Memorystatus to look for problems and run the Memory Consumption report.
March 11, 2008 at 7:55 am
That much pagefile usage indicates a memory problem. If memory is set correctly you should only see a minimum amount of the pagefile being accessed. The main reason...
March 11, 2008 at 6:15 am
It's the same thought as a locally-attached "expanded volume". As in - if you have a volume directly attached, and it starts running out of disk space, you can...
March 7, 2008 at 9:00 am
You say virtual LUN so does this mean the RAID is a software RAID and not hardware. I always thought a set of disks could only have one hardware...
March 7, 2008 at 7:57 am
Are you saying you have a RAID 10 and RAID 5 running at the same time on the same set of disks? Is that even possible?
March 7, 2008 at 7:08 am
They sent me some white papers and I'm going to have a call with an EMC SQL rep tomorrow.
Thanks
March 5, 2008 at 12:01 pm
Thought I would chime in on this topic. We noticed the same thing regarding the inability to generate a script containing the members of fixed database roles in 2005....
March 5, 2008 at 8:11 am
Thanks. This will be helpful. I'm still going to contact Microsoft regarding what I believe to be a bug in their scripting process. It shouldn't take an...
March 4, 2008 at 12:13 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 321 total)
This website stores cookies on your computer.
These cookies are used to improve your website experience and provide more personalized services to you, both on this website and through other media.
To find out more about the cookies we use, see our Privacy Policy