Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 1,081 total)
Thanks.
Ok so now it looks like we down to the Properties table. I did notice another lookup popout there, I'm sure you know how to remove that now, but it...
June 12, 2009 at 4:09 am
Paul8112 (6/12/2009)
I've just updated the statistics, and the query time is now down to 26 seconds.
nice one.
Ok could we get a new plan please.
June 12, 2009 at 4:02 am
could you also confirm that the stats are up to date?
June 12, 2009 at 3:55 am
It's an option for the Property index I'm just worried about the impact of creating a LARGE index that is so wide just for this query...
Might be worth trying to...
June 12, 2009 at 3:46 am
Ok the other thing is are your stats up to date?
I've noticed most of your estimated vs actual row counts vary largely, I'm not if this is stats out of...
June 12, 2009 at 3:42 am
What type of field is ImageUrl?
I think this should be added to your Property image covering index that should get rid of the Key Loopup for that table.
June 12, 2009 at 3:34 am
WOW Great post.
Most people don't take the time to give as much info as you have thanks for that.
For the execution plan, could you post the actual plan as a...
June 12, 2009 at 3:21 am
Hi Sergiy,
The index that I created to test the OP's problem definitely has a field in postion 1 that is of type 'BIT'.
I do agree with you I would probably...
June 12, 2009 at 2:03 am
Gail am I correcting in saying and I think I might have learn't or if I am wrong missunderstood, but ify ou have two columns in your where clause and...
June 11, 2009 at 5:56 am
Joseph Fallon what order are the fields in your in covering index, this will make a difference.
The other thing to look out for is that I'm pretty sure, but happy...
June 11, 2009 at 5:28 am
As mentioned, please supply more information in the form of table structures queries and execution plans.
June 11, 2009 at 2:36 am
Hi,
The first thing to remember is that the estimate execution plan is "estimated" and not "actual", so you can't trust it to be what will actually happen.
Second the %'s from...
June 10, 2009 at 4:25 am
Have you tried this?
SELECT *
FROM
(
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY GETDATE())as NUM, Id FROM @tbl
) p
PIVOT (MIN(ID) FOR NUM IN ([1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10])) PVT
You can just use the same sample data...
June 9, 2009 at 5:55 am
Thanks Barry, I wasn't aware of that 🙂
Learn't something new for the day .
June 9, 2009 at 2:13 am
could you give me an example of two tables with a few columns from each table and then the relationship for those tables in a create script and then I...
June 9, 2009 at 2:12 am
Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 1,081 total)