Viewing 11 posts - 511 through 521 (of 521 total)
Unfortunately I guess you will have no luck.
The nearest thing you could do is something like this:
DECLARE @myDbName sysname
SET @myDbName = 'Northwind'
EXEC ('USE ' + @myDbName + '; SELECT...
October 8, 2007 at 1:14 pm
According to theory, if we want a table, then there is no order.
If we have order, then we have no table.
Exactly. So it depends on whether you want a table...
October 8, 2007 at 8:51 am
Hello R.
thanks for pulling out this information. It certainly helps most users get detailed insight into this topic.
I already knew these BOL explanations. Thats why I used 99.999999999 PERCENT...
October 8, 2007 at 8:08 am
Hi Colin,
I still think that order by in a view would make sense if the order by is the last step performed and the view is not joined to anything...
October 8, 2007 at 8:03 am
Thanks Ed! This was was really helpful.
May I ask you from where you got your knowledge?
Especially the parallel execution doesnt seem to be
well documented out in the net.
October 8, 2007 at 7:43 am
Hello Andy,
thanks for the article. But I think this only moves the problem around.
Archiving in my eyes means to move the data out of SQL Server.
Therefore I usually take the...
October 8, 2007 at 1:21 am
Hello Jeff,
Thanks very much for your answer first. But unfortunately this was exactly the type of answer I was trying to avoid. From what I can see my sample is...
October 8, 2007 at 12:41 am
It is a little difficult to answer correctly if there is no correct answer to choose.
I took my 50% chance to select the hidden 2383 out of the two 2382...
March 23, 2007 at 1:57 am
January 31, 2007 at 12:38 am
Here's the official info from BOL:
In earlier versions of Microsoft® SQL Server™ 2000, left and right outer join conditions were specified in the WHERE clause using the *=...
May 15, 2006 at 2:47 am
May 5, 2006 at 1:58 am
Viewing 11 posts - 511 through 521 (of 521 total)