Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 521 total)
This is what I found:
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2008/editions/specifications.mspx
Kind of confusing to me...
Edit: I think I understand now... Just because Win2K8 supports Hot Add also on X86 it does not mean ...
January 16, 2008 at 3:27 am
Hello,
could you please tell my why you would not use profiler to audit logins?
Is this putting too much burden on the server?
Thanks!
January 15, 2008 at 12:53 am
Are your DBs hosting distinct data?
Do you need to be able to update your data?
Then go for Distributed Partitioned Views
January 14, 2008 at 1:48 pm
Just as additional info to Matts post:
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Performance+Tuning/sp_performance/850/
January 14, 2008 at 1:35 pm
I think this question is incorrect:
CLR Data Types are not "published". CLR data types are data types of the common language run time, not SQL Server. What the author probably...
January 10, 2008 at 12:44 am
Hi Andy!
Thanks for this nice quickie! What I really like about this one is its simplicity and shortness.
It doesn't always have to be the complete and in-depth analysis of...
January 8, 2008 at 12:30 am
The following query should also take care of values without digits:
SELECTstring Original
,CASEWHEN PATINDEX('%[0-9]%',string) > 0
THEN LEFT(string, PATINDEX('%[0-9]%',string)-1)
ELSE RTRIM(string) END-- Characters first
+ REPLICATE('0', 4-LEN(string))-- Stuff with zeros
+...
December 17, 2007 at 8:36 am
As Gail stated, CTEs are nothing more than "in-line views".
I also had a discussion about those not too long ago:-)
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic411895-338-1.aspx
December 8, 2007 at 1:50 pm
:)Or in a simple query:
SELECTstring Original
,CASEWHEN ISNUMERIC(string) = 0
THEN LEFT(string, PATINDEX('%[0-9]%',string)-1)
ELSE '' END-- Characters first
+ REPLICATE('0', 4-LEN(string))-- Stuff with zeros
+ SUBSTRING(string, PATINDEX('%[0-9]%',string), 4)-- Add numeric remainder
ASModified
FROM...
December 8, 2007 at 1:06 pm
Hi Ramesh,
what makes you sure that the order of the rows is guaranteed in your example?
December 7, 2007 at 7:24 am
Hi Matt,
The query I "wrote" was just a copy of the query that Chirag posted.
December 7, 2007 at 7:11 am
I have compared the CURSOR method against the WHILE loop, and on my machine the first one completes in 10.990 seconds for 80000 rows, and the latter completes in 9.460....
December 7, 2007 at 6:48 am
From my experience (which is not too big), a linked table is the only viable option when you want to download by joining to 10.000 local rows.
SELECT D.x, D.y ...
FROM...
December 7, 2007 at 5:53 am
Hm,
And what happens with the following query?
I hope it contains no error.
SELECT D1.[SID_0COMPANY] AS [SID_0COMPANY]
FROM mdp.[/BIC/DZFIGL_C021] D1
WHERE EXISTS ( SELECT *
...
December 7, 2007 at 3:37 am
Hi Jeff, Chirag,
I am not sure if I misunderstood something, but the SQL Statement does NOT utilize a "triangular join":
Select orderid,orderdate,productid
from orders O INNER JOIN orderdetails OD
On O.orderid = OD.OrderId
WHERE...
December 7, 2007 at 12:39 am
Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 521 total)