Viewing 15 posts - 1,381 through 1,395 (of 1,412 total)
Hmmm... I checked the (planned) schedule. Your session only conflicted with five other interesting ones... I hate (and love) these conferences with too much to see.
Chris...
September 17, 2001 at 3:25 am
Brian, you need to install service pack 2 for your brain, that will make it choose TOP instead of SET ROWCOUNT.
Chris Hedgate @ Apptus Technologies (
September 14, 2001 at 3:09 am
Yep, I saw it this morning when I got to work.
OK, if it doesn't clash with anything else interesting (as if...) I'll try to attend your talk.
Chris Hedgate @ Apptus...
September 14, 2001 at 3:03 am
OK, thanks.
Andy, which session(s) are you speaking at?
Chris Hedgate @ Apptus Technologies (http://www.apptus.se)
September 13, 2001 at 5:00 am
Brian: From what I've heard, using TOP is recommended over SET ROWCOUNT, mostly because the optimizer can take TOP into account. Am I wrong on that?
Andy: Nice solution, slightly better...
September 13, 2001 at 2:03 am
This may not be the best solution, but it will work:
SELECT TOP 200 col1, col2 ...
FROM table
WHERE NOT idcol IN (SELECT TOP 2000 idcol FROM table ORDER BY somecol)
ORDER...
September 12, 2001 at 7:12 am
SELECT * INTO newtable
FROM employee
WHERE 1 = 0
Chris Hedgate @ Apptus Technologies (http://www.apptus.se)
September 6, 2001 at 2:27 am
Anyone? Otherwise I guess I'll have to wait for PASS and ask someone from MS (or Kalen Delaney perhaps), just two weeks now...
Chris Hedgate @ Apptus Technologies (http://www.apptus.se)
September 6, 2001 at 2:26 am
Andy wrote:
> Why did you decide to code it yourself vs
openxml?
Two reasons:
1) I had some older code from a SQL 7 'experimental app' that used them so I just...
September 3, 2001 at 2:57 pm
I agree with Andy, use the master-server functionality if possible. Take a look at these sprocs in msdb:
* sp_add_job
* sp_add_jobstep
* sp_update_job
* sp_add_jobschedule
* sp_add_jobserver
Chris Hedgate @...
August 28, 2001 at 1:58 am
I'd say yes. But why not just try it?
Chris Hedgate @ Apptus Technologies (http://www.apptus.se)
August 9, 2001 at 3:16 am
Hmm...forgot to answer...
It should be IP:Port, but you have to know which port.
Chris Hedgate @ Apptus Technologies (http://www.apptus.se)
August 2, 2001 at 8:23 am
By default, a named instance uses a dynamically chosen (at startup) port number to listen on. You can change this behaviour and force it to listen on a specified port...
August 2, 2001 at 8:22 am
Embed the OBJECT_ID() function in a stored procedure on the remote server, and execute the proc with the name of the object you want the id for.
Chris Hedgate @ Apptus...
August 2, 2001 at 6:29 am
quote:
So, again, can anyone confirm this behavior in SP1?
Sorry to be bugging you with this...
July 31, 2001 at 3:09 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1,381 through 1,395 (of 1,412 total)