Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 309 total)
Hello Lowry,
kb933508, kb933097...
Its a little bit confusing and not very clear.
We will see what we will apply... not very "confortable" with all that.
Best regards.
Carl
March 19, 2007 at 2:10 pm
Thanks Mohammed,
What SQL Bug number, in this hotfix, do you think is related to what we are living here?
Best regards.
Carl
March 19, 2007 at 1:36 pm
For the Rebuild Indexes job we have this output (poping when we go to see the maintenance plan generated SQL):
Rebuild failed for Index 'idx1'. (Microsoft.SqlServer.Smo)
------------------------------
For help,...
March 19, 2007 at 11:29 am
Good idea! Never thought of it. I will tell my boss...
I'll wait for you to implement it first and tell me how it goes...
February 8, 2007 at 7:05 am
Thanks Steve and what about the possibility to resume what was began before the "crash"?
February 7, 2007 at 8:42 am
Here is the answer posted by a Microsoft SQL Server member of the "Storage Engine - Accces method team":
As Ping has already... |
January 29, 2007 at 12:09 pm
I finally found the problem: It is only that the SQL Server Browser service was not running...
Nothing was listening on UDP port 1433 to give the dynamic port allocated (3416)...
January 24, 2007 at 7:04 am
Hello Muhammed, Yelena,
I had mention in the first post that I had done a test using named pipes and it worked:
osql /S\\sql5\pipe\MSSQL$gcrm\sql\query /E
It is obviously the same thing if...
January 24, 2007 at 6:37 am
Hello Muhammed... what do you mean exactly?
Regards.
Carl
January 23, 2007 at 2:28 pm
It worked.
It would involve a lot of modification in the code of our application... But nothing would ensure we are not reading something that is in the process of being...
January 22, 2007 at 1:37 pm
What is more confusing is...
If I run the query done by proccess ID 112 (without commiting) and than I run the query done by process ID 87, it is ok.....
January 22, 2007 at 1:05 pm
Hello Francis,
Thanks for your input...
Process 122 have an IX on the table (TAB) which does not forbid another process having an IX lock on the same table (TAB).
Try to QUERY one of your...
January 22, 2007 at 10:11 am
Thanks Mohammed,
You are rigth : Using old system table (now views on SQL Server 2005) work the same way as SQL Server 2000 for naming resolution.
Maybe we won't have the...
January 16, 2007 at 6:37 am
You can also use an alias no the client side.
Carl
December 21, 2006 at 1:42 pm
My complain is not about creating a maintenance plan but maintaining it .
We can have more than one hundred databases on a server.
We may need...
December 21, 2006 at 12:50 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 309 total)