Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 309 total)
Rectification: The indexes were not rebuilt at all. They were rebuilt only in another database. It was a mistake. So the fact that the DBCC SHRINK DATABASE worked is not...
September 18, 2015 at 6:08 am
I am not 100% sure but I think that having rebuild all the indexes help us to shrink the database with this command:
DBCC SHRINKDATABASE(N'BIG_DB')
At the end, without the option to...
September 17, 2015 at 10:17 am
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (9/15/2015)
You could maybe create a new filegroup, move the table, then shrink the...
September 15, 2015 at 9:35 am
I Gail,
The index rebuild did not help for this command:
DBCC SHRINKFILE (N'big_db' , 0, TRUNCATEONLY)
But instead, I found that using this command was actually shrinking the file:
DBCC SHRINKFILE (N'big_db' ,...
September 15, 2015 at 8:58 am
Thank's for your input Alvin.
Querying the star schema will be one of our tests but we expect it to be way much slower than querying the cube with MDX.
Best regards.
Carl
August 4, 2015 at 7:16 am
"Is it possible to have a MDX query that restrict (WHERE CLAUSE) based on a column's value that is in a fact table?"
Lets give an example:
Lets say we want to...
July 14, 2015 at 10:26 am
This also permit us to include conversion scripts that only modify the data (DML not DDL) which I don't know how this would be done with the other method (State).
April 13, 2015 at 12:15 pm
Hi Steve,
We are upgrading all our databases with migration scripts. We implement it in a way that the tool (that is used to run the conversions) knows which conversion scripts...
April 9, 2015 at 8:52 am
Carl B. (11/8/2013)
... if we can avoid rebuilding index uselessly on big tables our client will appreciate that.
To be more precise I should have wrote:
... if we can avoid rebuilding...
November 8, 2013 at 7:22 am
Hi Sean,
It would be simpler to process all the tables. But let's say you can avoid rebuilding indexes on 5 to10 really big tables, it would reduce a lot the...
November 8, 2013 at 7:10 am
GilaMonster (11/7/2013)
Do your tables change definitions so often for this to be the primary concern and trigger for rebuilding indexes?
Hi Gail,
Yes. The contexte is the following :
Application upgrade with a...
November 7, 2013 at 6:36 am
ScottPletcher (11/6/2013)
2. That's an extremely tricky thing to try to do. You could try to analyze the avg_fragmentation_in_percent, max_record_size_in_bytes and avg_record_size_in_bytes values from sys.dm_db_index_physical_stats, but it will still...
November 7, 2013 at 5:55 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 309 total)