Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 541 total)
As far as naming conventions go, I have one thing to say. BE CONSISTENT.
cl
April 6, 2005 at 11:54 am
I paid US$2.43 for a gallon of gas today, predicted to rise to US$3.00 by the end of summer. I realize that this is low compared to what a lot...
April 5, 2005 at 12:58 pm
Good stuff...good stuff. I posted the article to slashdot...it's their type of humour. They've got a bunch of funny crap today:
Davidlost writes "A PC-to-human virus, known as Malwarlaria.B is...
April 1, 2005 at 12:01 pm
You managed to confuse me as well. I have no idea if this is helpful, but a generalized "Sequence" table can make a lot of "incrementing" processes set based. Insert...
March 31, 2005 at 1:24 pm
You shouldn't need to do a delete/insert to get these results, use a derived table with unions instead.
select officeID, sum(tSum) as TotalSum
from
(
select officeid,sum(Sales) as tSum
from Salesrecord_Prouct_A
group by officeid
union all
select officeid,sum(Sales)
from...
March 31, 2005 at 1:12 pm
If Grokster looses this case expect there to be serious reprocussions in the tech world. However, it does look promising, the Supreme Court does seem to grok the technical issues,...
March 31, 2005 at 12:55 pm
"Starting from MySQL 3.23.44, InnoDB features foreign key constraints." NOTE: Current recommended production version is 4.1
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/innodb-foreign-key-constraints.html
The mySQL version of a check constraint is called a "set" or "enum" constraint...
March 30, 2005 at 3:56 pm
mySQL offers a fairly high level of compliance:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/compatibility.html
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/differences-from-ansi.html
I don't know why you think mySQL doesn't offer constraints, cause it does:
mySQL is a work in...
March 30, 2005 at 2:08 pm
SQL CLR is Microsoft specific (right now), while SQL/PSM is an accepted SQL Standard. I grant that support for SQL/PSM has been sparse, but I don't see that as a...
March 30, 2005 at 1:54 pm
Joe is a bit of a reactionist, but he's right on the money here.
By accepting the CLR into SQL you are no longer going to be writing SQL. I mean,...
March 30, 2005 at 1:33 pm
declare @Table table (dtDate datetime, ID int)
declare @ID int
select @ID = 0
While @ID < 1000
BEGIN
--Replace with table lookup (preferably on PK)
--Select top 1 @ID = ID
--From Table
--Where ID > @ID int
--Order by...
March 30, 2005 at 1:08 pm
You probably didn't get an answer because this is a super hard problem. Really, you are looking at what can only be called a bug (functionaly challenged, if you will).
Here's...
March 30, 2005 at 12:56 pm
You are right.
Use staging tables to load data from DTS, making sure the data conforms to what is needed, then do the Insert/Updates against the live tables as one transaction.
Or...
March 30, 2005 at 12:46 pm
"there are three tables available to you":
Actually, all tables are available, plus the inserted and updated tables.
"You must use the deleted table to determine what the value was before...
March 30, 2005 at 12:37 pm
Bill,
The only way I've been able to do this is:
Procedures: Get the count and return it to DTS using an Output parameter (into a global variable). This can be tricky...
March 25, 2005 at 2:24 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 541 total)