Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
Yeah, it works like a champ! Thanks again sushila
August 16, 2005 at 8:03 pm
That bottom query would be what the stored procedure generates, but it would dynamically generate that query based on the rule passed to the stored procedure. I think I...
August 16, 2005 at 6:12 pm
1)Yes, which is part of the reason I am developing this rule-based approach in the first place.
2)Yes, pos_user_type.id = pos_user_type_link.user_type_id; likewise users.id = pos_user_type_link.user_id
3)There is no yes or no. ...
August 15, 2005 at 3:08 pm
First off, thanks for helping!
From the example above's tables:
pos_user_type(id, description):
1, 'Regular POS user'
2, 'Supervisor'
3, 'Administrator'
pos_user_type_link(user_type_id, user_id):
1, 1
1, 2
1, 3
1, 4
2, 2
2, 3
3, 3
users(id, name):
1, 'joe'
2, 'beth'
3, 'julie'
4, 'paul'
I am attempting...
August 15, 2005 at 1:36 pm
It's a long story-but I am defining a way to simplify administration of multiple applications each differently under a rule based approach.
application "pos system"
tables
pos_user_type_link(user_type_id, user_id)
pos_user_type(id, description)
application "other system"
tables
other_system_type_link(user_type_id, user_id)
other_system_type(id, description)
universal...
August 15, 2005 at 12:59 pm
I would use #temp tables but I would like to order the data being inserted into the temp table (and as far as I know I must use @tables instead...
August 15, 2005 at 12:20 pm
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)