Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
As they used to say in the project management unit I did at uni:
"Time, quality and cost. Pick any two!"
September 24, 2012 at 9:27 pm
Would I be correct in saying that decreased data replication is a major reason why normalisation and foreign keys decrease storage requirements?
August 6, 2012 at 6:32 pm
There is a reason why my old university teaches you normalisation before they even let you touch SQL with a kilometre long pole. In my opinion, the only remotely forgivable...
August 1, 2012 at 9:27 pm
You can try to Google "IDENTITY SQL Server"
I am sure you will get lots of information which can't be provided in a single forum
If you still have any doubts after...
July 31, 2012 at 6:31 pm
If Steve worked with our company, he'd be in a lot of trouble. Seriously, the number of problems we've had because users haven't rebooted there machine in ages is ridiculous....
June 21, 2012 at 6:50 pm
I took one look at this article and thought "What's so special about this?" It's hardly revolutionary!
May 17, 2012 at 6:45 pm
SQLRNNR (3/23/2012)
Depends on the developer and the level of responsibility they are willing to take.
I agree, but you would hope someone computer literate enough to be a developer, would also...
March 26, 2012 at 11:56 pm
patrickmcginnis59 (3/22/2012)
Lynn Pettis (3/22/2012)
patrickmcginnis59 (3/22/2012)
UnbalancedKarma (3/22/2012)
The article is the usual C#/VB snobbery and in-fighting but the linked reply makes some good points in the case for VB.NET.
Comparing the two is...
March 22, 2012 at 6:27 pm
SQL Guy 1 (3/20/2012)
This is one of the single most opinionated/biased article I have ever read!...
March 20, 2012 at 9:38 pm
I think we can safely say that the majority of modern programming languages (including C#) have a high amount of influence from C or one of its deriavatives. Therefore, C#...
March 15, 2012 at 9:47 pm
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)