Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 211 total)
Please, let's not start the religious war on whether blobs even belong in the database at all - that's not what this thread is about. For several reasons, in...
March 25, 2008 at 9:10 am
The performance merits of storing different parts of the database on separate disks (actually disk arrays) is obvious - you get more spindles working for you and perhaps even more...
March 25, 2008 at 7:41 am
I was seeing ms/IO (from fn_virtualfilestats) of over 80 in my 170 Gig database that is about 70Gig Blobs and 100 Gig other data. I decided to put the...
March 24, 2008 at 10:43 am
I am amazed at the lack of responses from the religious left this time around.
We always design for replication, we use it fairly often. And records generally get created...
February 11, 2008 at 7:29 am
I intend to work less, make more, and help Ms. South Carolina achieve world peace and learn to read maps.
January 2, 2008 at 12:11 pm
Good answer Bill. I had almost the same reply half typed up when I went back and saw your answer.
August 10, 2007 at 1:46 pm
I'm confused. Is the question "char or nchar" as the title states? or "char or varchar" as the answers are running?
Char or Nchar (or varchar vs Nvarchar) is the choice to...
August 10, 2007 at 8:18 am
My philosophy on the whole setup is that the allocation of files was just wrong. While you may have hardware issues, you're asking each array to hold widely different types of data instead...
August 9, 2007 at 6:49 am
Uh, no I can't. It's not a script. It's a small Visual Basic program, the contents of which are very specific to your Server, what mail OCX you use, and...
July 5, 2007 at 8:14 am
I approach the problem a little bit differently. I don't just want to know if the SQL server is running or not, I want to know if my customers can...
July 5, 2007 at 6:43 am
Well, probably because I don't really know how! The existing system works fine and is plenty fast for our needs. One advantage of doing it the way you suggest would...
June 12, 2007 at 12:49 pm
Our strategy is to backup across the network from the primary sql server to the backup sql server. That way if I need to turn the backup into the primary...
June 12, 2007 at 9:06 am
I don't mind that I missed this one, I answered for how I HOPED it worked. The best possible outcome would be for the local backup to finish, and the...
May 29, 2007 at 11:20 pm
The "correct" answer doesn't satisfy the base requirements! 3 100 gig drives in raid 5 only gives you 200 gig of usable space!!!!
May 16, 2007 at 6:30 am
Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 211 total)