Viewing 10 posts - 76 through 85 (of 85 total)
If you stare at the monitor really hard and squint, (A) actually is incorrect.
August 29, 2006 at 12:38 pm
The BOL I have says the data type is dependent on the data type of the result set. I "guessed" correctly on this question, but the question does not give...
August 29, 2006 at 12:10 pm
How can you make such a claim? sp_unsetapprole isn't even in BOL.
August 28, 2006 at 12:39 pm
Someone really should screen these questions BETTER. I'm looking 2005 BOL and it explicitly says the ONLY upgrade path supported from 2000 EE is to 2005 EE.
August 25, 2006 at 1:16 pm
It's actually two (2) separate questions...each with a potentially different answer.
August 10, 2006 at 11:03 am
Truly a subjective question (based on the "correct" answer). I feel cheated as well.
August 7, 2006 at 12:00 pm
You folks are playing symantics here. You need to read BOL.
August 7, 2006 at 8:25 am
Tried it...didn't work in my case
September 20, 2005 at 2:19 pm
There is nothing inherantly wrong with running 2 instances of SQL Server on physical Server as long as you understand that they will be sharing server resources, and you divide...
March 7, 2005 at 2:15 pm
I am getting the exact same error using ITW in Query Analyzer against a single select statement. In playing with it, I have found it will not analyze a query...
February 16, 2005 at 2:19 pm
Viewing 10 posts - 76 through 85 (of 85 total)