Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 37 total)
Probably stating the obvious here but not even Google is a 10.
November 17, 2010 at 3:39 am
Whatever you do, don't get rid of the QOD! And at the very least please ensure that a good proportion of those questions are ambiguous or ill thought through, as...
May 14, 2010 at 2:39 am
Surely the only sensible output from running this is: "Query was cancelled by user.";-)
April 13, 2010 at 3:35 am
george sibbald (3/19/2010)
March 22, 2010 at 6:57 am
Hey... If I'd just disclosed the names of my kids on a blog, my wife would have to change all her passwords! Dangerous things, names.
November 27, 2009 at 3:18 am
BackupGuy (11/20/2009)
November 20, 2009 at 5:25 am
majorbloodnock (11/20/2009)
Japie Botma (11/20/2009)
Recommended or not. This is what the auditors want in a corporate world. To prevent network administrator access.
I agree, and I must admit there are...
November 20, 2009 at 4:47 am
Ok I'm confusing myself here between authentication and authorisation... which I always do... What I mean is that I'd like to see sql server require both windows and sql authorisation....
November 20, 2009 at 3:27 am
Don't think I'd like just sql Authentication... If I were to have a third option I'd go with requiring both sql and windows authentication (not sql or windows)...
November 20, 2009 at 2:45 am
chrisn-585491 (11/18/2009)
This doesn't work in SQL Server 2005 TSQL , end up with an a Msg 1305...:unsure:
worked for me in 2005
November 18, 2009 at 7:24 am
Nice question... demonstrates how the subtraction operation implicitly casts the result as an integer data type thus avoiding the error message that '435365' on its own would have caused.
November 18, 2009 at 5:34 am
QUOTATION: I speak Spanish to God, Italian to women, French to men and German to my horse.
ATTRIBUTION: King Charles V (1500–1558), King of Spain and Holy Roman Emperor.
Looks like...
April 3, 2009 at 10:21 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 37 total)