Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 47 total)
Thanks for the information.
I hope the end of support means that they wont be developing / selling the product anymore, but still would provide support for the existing customers.
Though the...
May 5, 2011 at 3:19 am
I use the Administrator's Pocket consultant book
http://www.microsoft.com/learning/en/us/book.aspx?ID=12755&locale=en-us#
May 3, 2011 at 11:20 pm
cppwiz (4/26/2011)
Did you view your new...
May 3, 2011 at 11:08 pm
Drake Teran (8/25/2009)
I recently encountered the same dillema.* SSMS: connect to your SSAS.
* Right-click Server
* Reports
* Standard Reports
* General
* VOILA!
-DT
that was the easiest!! Thanks :smooooth:
December 22, 2010 at 8:50 am
yes, I could see that I am able to view that report not only in the monitor server, but also in the primary and secondary servers in the log shipping...
August 9, 2010 at 4:13 am
When we ran the setup in SQL 2005 and older versions, we used to see the Edition in the welcome screen of setup.
maybe Microsoft had started hating to add that...
July 30, 2010 at 7:58 am
well, I would take it as there is no other way possible :hehe:
July 30, 2010 at 7:49 am
Thanks for your replies.
But I guess my question has not been put clear. I didnt want to know about the edition of the installed instances. I have "SQL server 2008...
July 30, 2010 at 6:54 am
The article was very informative, but I would like to rephrase the below clause in modern terms.
When combining VBScript with DTS and SQL-DMO, I bet almost all administration work can...
February 24, 2010 at 1:25 am
I had been thinking that SQL 6.0 was the first version developed for NT. but seems there had been a version 4.21 also :hehe:
these evolutionary versions 4.21, 6.0, 6.5 really...
December 21, 2009 at 5:14 am
an accidental cross join is usually the culprit
thats right.. even i had faced a similar issue wherein a large cross join was the troublemaker.
December 13, 2009 at 8:59 pm
As with all Microsoft products, SQL server 2005 needed a service pack 3 too. And now its already up and running fine!!
September 24, 2009 at 5:12 am
Steve, Thanks for caring to reply for this one..
The problem is, I can run the jobs on any server from any other server connected using the TCP protocol (registered with...
September 23, 2009 at 7:53 am
No, I didnt have the option to get back that RAM.
Still that problem had not been solved in that workstation, and no one who have seen it had been able...
September 23, 2009 at 7:34 am
This issue occurs even if I attempt to run the jobs remotely using sp_start_job.
The same jobs run without issues if I invoke them manually from inside the servers or from...
September 7, 2009 at 2:52 am
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 47 total)