Viewing 15 posts - 736 through 750 (of 883 total)
Good article. When are you writing the difference beween SQL Server 2005 and SQL Server 2008.
🙂
May 8, 2008 at 3:09 am
Jeff Moden (5/8/2008)
Anirban Paul (5/8/2008)
We had a discussion regarding this article couple of days back in another forum. I was waiting for this article. I have no words to praise...
May 8, 2008 at 3:05 am
Jeff
We had a discussion regarding this article couple of days back in another forum. I was waiting for this article. I have no words to praise this one. I just...
May 8, 2008 at 12:46 am
I also agree that it should available in 2-3 versions. 🙂
May 7, 2008 at 5:02 am
Yoiu are welcome. But do not forget the John's advice. Remember while designing tables.
🙂
May 7, 2008 at 4:57 am
You can divide the table into two parts. Have a Dept table with Dept Id and Dept Name. In Team Details have Dept ID, Team ID, Team Name and status.
There...
May 6, 2008 at 10:22 pm
Matt Miller (5/6/2008)
Oh wait - never mind...:D
(thanks for the feedback...
May 6, 2008 at 9:58 pm
Very good practical and useful article. 🙂
May 6, 2008 at 10:12 am
The last 3-4 questions are really good. The quality of questions have improved. We should applaud the team. 🙂
May 6, 2008 at 9:38 am
Why twice? Formally twice and unformally ....................:D
May 6, 2008 at 9:32 am
Nik Southworth (5/6/2008)
My Test Results.SQL 2008 w/ Compression
Size: 3.39GB
Time: 12 Mins
CPU%: AVG 40%
SQL 2008 wo/ Compression
Size: 14.0GB
Time: 21 Mins
CPU%: AVG 30%
Restore details to follow.
Good findings. In terms of speed and...
May 6, 2008 at 6:00 am
Chris Morris (5/2/2008)
karthikeyan (11/22/2007)
May 6, 2008 at 5:53 am
Why we didn't update the content of the articl;e before re-publishing. We should have written about DPM 2007. 🙂
May 6, 2008 at 2:56 am
Viewing 15 posts - 736 through 750 (of 883 total)