Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 71 total)
D is a local drive
Regards
Alexander
October 8, 2010 at 5:46 am
SSIS is more suitable for data transfer (like DML) and not to transfer object definitions (like DDL).
Have you already tried the Import/Export wizard from management studio (context menu of a...
July 5, 2010 at 9:10 am
Kinda basic:
Is your XXX.dtsx already existing in the bin directory?
Do you have file system write permission on the file and the directory?
July 5, 2010 at 9:05 am
First of all, SSIS is not a component that is supposed to have unser interaction, because it is a server technology, so I would not do this.
If you really want...
July 5, 2010 at 9:00 am
According to http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143761.aspx the ssis differences between SE and EE are only a few tasks and transformations that have to do with term extraction, some fuzzy stuff and data mining.
No...
June 10, 2009 at 4:21 am
I am using server storage and I am not using a config file.
June 3, 2009 at 1:12 am
Unfortunately there is no other error message in the screen log.
June 3, 2009 at 1:11 am
I have saved a copy of the package to sql server using server storage protection level and executed the package from the ssis instance from within ssms.
The command line is:
/DTS...
June 2, 2009 at 9:26 am
Hi Kevin,
From your data source connect to a multicast transform. The first output is to be sorted by ntname the second by manager. Then join the two thread (probably left...
June 2, 2009 at 8:51 am
Now I found out that Report B accepts the parameters only as fully qualified MDX member names like "[Time].[Quarter].&[Q1 2007]" and that the first report passes only "Q1 2007". Of...
March 26, 2009 at 12:56 am
I had tried it before setting it to
=""
but then ssrs is autonumbering the columns starting with 1. But now I tried it again, this time with
=" "
(notice the blank),...
January 14, 2009 at 5:06 am
The component that inserts the two rows is the only component that is aware of the fact that these rows have been imported in the same transaction. So you have...
November 28, 2008 at 6:11 am
Have a lool at my suggestion above
November 28, 2008 at 4:50 am
Hi,
what about generating a uid inside the transaction:
declare @U uniqueidentifier;
create table #mytab1 (x int, y uniqueidentifier);
create table #mytab2 (x int, y uniqueidentifier);
begin transaction
set @U=newid();
insert into #mytab1(x,y)...
November 28, 2008 at 3:15 am
Looks like you need to join the table with itself. But from the example you give I cannot understand what your join condition should look like.
Please give more information which...
November 28, 2008 at 2:50 am
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 71 total)