Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)
Awesome, thanks buddy, ended up doing both things and apparently that took care of everything!
Thanks
Alex C
MysteryJimbo (7/27/2011)
Alexander Chacon (7/26/2011)
July 27, 2011 at 6:56 am
Problem resolved, see post below, I can still post stats if you'd like to? Let me know
as2higpark (7/26/2011)
Any progress on the wait stats? My query will show the stats...
July 26, 2011 at 1:52 pm
Hello all, resolution of this appears to be not related to hardware at all but actually from going to SQL Server 2008 R1 to R2 and differences with the query...
July 26, 2011 at 1:52 pm
Tried both local and SAN
Jim Sleeman-388184 (7/26/2011)
Is the data on the local drive of the new machine or the SAN?
July 26, 2011 at 1:50 pm
This is exactly what is happening, identical queries, identical actual execution plans, same dataset, old box takes 1min 11secs, new box takes 7 minutes, on every occasion tho durations differs...
July 26, 2011 at 10:50 am
Actual execution plans are identical!
Jim Sleeman-388184 (7/26/2011)
The reason I ask is that it...
July 26, 2011 at 10:46 am
Hi as2higpark, how can I pull those statistics during the execution of a query?
Thanks
Alex C
as2higpark (7/26/2011)
When you are seeing issues on the new server, what is the highest wait...
July 26, 2011 at 9:01 am
Well, the DB seems to be pretty much cached in memory, box has 128GB and DB is 50GB, there's like 60GB used so far, and executing a query the first...
July 26, 2011 at 8:59 am
Oh ok I love the way microsoft describes their hotfixes then hehehe, seems to be fairly common. I also seem to want to engage microsoft themselves with this one, what...
July 25, 2011 at 3:21 pm
Thanks MysteryJimbo, not sure the KB article would work for me since server doesn't really become unresponsive, it's just taking too long to complete queries that I would hope were...
July 25, 2011 at 1:12 pm
Thanks guys for you valuable input. MysteryJimbo I would like to hear more about your story and if you remember that missing 3rd step would love to hear about it....
July 25, 2011 at 7:25 am
Also on Passmark CPU test AMD 6172 gets 7748 vs Intel X5560 5423 ?
July 24, 2011 at 6:59 am
Sure GSquared, understood, so they perform quite better per thread than your regular Intel, however I find hard to believe that an AMD Opteron 6172 @ 2 GHz processor that...
July 24, 2011 at 6:47 am
Nevermind people, I just realized OPENXML is not capable to do a direct conversion from base64 to a binary type. That's really annoying, you know... if FORXML is capable of...
September 5, 2005 at 3:28 pm
I just realized my message was stripped from all the XML element tags... anyway the base 64 string can still be seen.
I think SQL is simply replacing each character in...
September 5, 2005 at 2:07 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)