Viewing 9 posts - 46 through 54 (of 54 total)
Hi Jonathan,
I see your point, I misunderstood the "integration test" line. Actually, it's a good observation, and I partially agree with you. If you just run the test as if,...
April 14, 2009 at 5:02 pm
Hi Jonathan,
I'm confused about what you mean with integration tests. Why you think this is the case ? It's true that I used it to test different systems, as mentioned...
April 14, 2009 at 2:33 pm
Hi James,
That means that one of the log files is not there. I'll review the script to validate that the log file exists.
Cheers,
Alejandro
April 14, 2009 at 9:23 am
Hey Brian,
totally agree about the complexity. I guess the first thing to do before using this is knowing how deep you want / can go. For brand new projects is...
April 14, 2009 at 8:29 am
Hi Brian,
This is a good observation, and I agree with you about the system testing if you just run it out-of-the-box.
This tool saves tons of time writing the queries from...
April 14, 2009 at 6:19 am
Hi Mike,
The test will validate if it runs without errors. Because you're executing stored procedures or t-sql commands, if there's an error, the unit test will fail, so the overall...
April 8, 2009 at 9:50 am
Hi karthikshanth,
You can actually test the calls to the database, so in a certain way you are testing the SSRS backend.
If you want to test the reports, there's a free...
April 8, 2009 at 5:56 am
Hi there,
GermanDBA is right, you should create some sort of backup/restore strategy or include the DB creation / data population prior to run the tests and then just drop the...
April 8, 2009 at 5:53 am
Hi Nancy,
sorry the delay but I'm on a trip and just saw your post. First of all, it won't work on SQL 2000 because I create a table variable, which...
March 16, 2009 at 7:51 pm
Viewing 9 posts - 46 through 54 (of 54 total)