Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 74 total)
And referring to an object in a database on the SAME server is as easy as:
select stuff from databasename.objectowner.ojectname
September 15, 2004 at 2:50 am
From the BOL entry on 'dbo', "any object created by any member of the sysadmin fixed server role belongs to dbo automatically". I would suggest that your connection to your...
September 10, 2004 at 3:04 am
.net framework is going to be part of Windows, soon enough. I believe that XP machines with Automatic Updates turned on will already have .net framework 1.1 on them. Installing it...
August 24, 2004 at 3:09 am
Having the trigger call an SP won't help, because the SP would still have to execute synchronously.
I would suggest having the trigger set a value, or create a row, in...
August 19, 2004 at 3:48 am
I imagine you have been experimenting with various GROUP BY and HAVING clauses on the Date fields yes? Tricky business. What I would do here is to cheat a bit. I...
August 19, 2004 at 3:34 am
Tell you what Bill, you write a T-SQL UDF that implements VB's Format function, and I'm sure you will get a special prize
August 19, 2004 at 3:19 am
I like this method! My usual solution to such requirements is to use selfjoins or EXISTS subqueries, but I think in future, at least when doing quick-n-dirty stuff in QA,...
August 19, 2004 at 3:17 am
>> I tried to read the database details using "SqldataReader", it says "System.Byte[]" for the "audiooriginaldata" column.
That's because that's what an Image data type is - a sequence (array) of...
August 18, 2004 at 3:22 am
Yes you can do this in pure SQL. Condition by condition:
-- Only dash or dot, @, 0-9, a-z characters only.
(myfield NOT LIKE...
August 18, 2004 at 3:03 am
Here you want a member that has Activity code Coordinator and Business codes code1 AND code2. The way to do this is to LEFT JOIN to Business twice, in effect...
August 12, 2004 at 3:15 am
The recent series of articles at sqlservercentral.com about SQL Server change control might be of interest also
August 12, 2004 at 3:06 am
Looking at your sample SQL calls, those are exactly what would you would expect from a pre-.NET application that didn't use stored procedures...
I believe that changing your client data access...
August 11, 2004 at 3:38 am
The broad heuristic is that if what you want to do can be done with set-based operations, do it with set-based operations; only use a cursor if you have to.
Depending...
August 11, 2004 at 3:29 am
I correclty guessed that the desired answer was Yes, however for me the question seems to break one of the cardinal rules of relational databases - there is no such...
August 9, 2004 at 3:33 am
Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 74 total)