Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 208 total)

  • RE: SubQuery

    Thanks for the great question and all the excellent comments.

  • RE: Precedence in math

    Thanks for easy one. Giving us the parens even made it easier.

  • RE: SQL JOINS

    Thanks for the question.

  • RE: Coalesce and Conversion

    Thanks for the great question! A true learning question with no controversy.

  • RE: RANK - 1

    Thanks for the question. Wasn't real familiar with these functions and I paid for it.

  • RE: T-SQL

    Thank you Sean. I was not questioning the validity of the number of correct answers, I just wanted to know what I was missing on #3 being incorrect.

  • RE: T-SQL

    Toreador (1/4/2013)


    Victor Abkin (1/4/2013)


    I disagree with the list of correct answers: this list should contain 5 answers, not 4.

    Asking to choose 4 answers makes it confusing

    There are 4 correct...

  • RE: T-SQL

    Lively debate today. It seems it is very hard to write a question of this sort without some confusion attached. Straight SQL questions with unequivocal results seem to...

  • RE: New Year's Math

    Thanks for the question.

  • RE: Aggregates in T-SQL

    Good question. Catching up on QotD, been on vacation.

  • RE: UNIQUE constraint

    I knew there might be a controversy over this question but I took a stab at YES because of the Itsik Ben-Gan article I read on this subject. Still I...

  • RE: PARSE 1

    Derek Dongray (12/19/2012)


    I can't see anywhere in the question where it says this is supposed to be for 2012. Presumbly, it was thought that it's enough that TRY_PARSE and PARSE...

  • RE: What will the max id be?

    Thanks for a nice easy Wednesday question.

  • RE: Table variables

    Greatly appreciated easy question after I struggled with yesterdays.

  • RE: PARSE 1

    Confused me. Do not have 2012 to play with. On 2008 this thing errors.

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 208 total)