What will be the output of the following?

Question

Post reply

What will be the output of the following?

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 144 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply

mjdouglass Valued Member Points: 53 More actions · Answer 1

The increment is by 1, not -1, so the values would be -1,0,1.

yogender SSC-Addicted Points: 477 More actions · Answer 2

There is something wrong with either question or with the answers.

Gill Rowley Ten Centuries Points: 1025 More actions · Answer 3

I, too, am getting (-1, 0, 1). The question is flawed. Posting this to get my point for an incorrectly identified incorrect answer!

gary.mazzone SSCarpal Tunnel Points: 4754 More actions · Answer 4

Point or no point (I selected -1,0,1 which I believe to be the correct answer) at least ensure that the question is legit before posting.

aleksandar.lazarov Valued Member Points: 74 More actions · Answer 5

aleksandar.lazarov

Valued Member

Points: 74

June 28, 2010 at 6:56 am

#1185687

Gief one point.

chrisfradenburg SSCrazy Eights Points: 9592 More actions · Answer 6

kaspencer (6/28/2010)
We all make mistakes, and we all forgive mistakes. But on a forum of this type we expect mistakes to be acknowledged by the moderators, and then corrected.

Right. However, I just read through 7 pages of mostly repeated posts about what the correct answer is seeing if a mod had already addressed anything. At some point that stops being pointing out an issue so it's known and can be corrected and becomes whining that isn't productive in the least. If you forgive a mistake you don't keep telling someone that it's wrong as people have been doing here.

TonyThorne Right there with Babe Points: 749 More actions · Answer 7

We can all see that to get the answer specified, the question should have read -1 and not 1. Does this really need to be repeated again?

TonyThorne Right there with Babe Points: 749 More actions · Answer 8

TonyThorne

Right there with Babe

Points: 749

June 28, 2010 at 7:13 am

#1185704

and again

mtassin SSC-Insane Points: 23099 More actions · Answer 9

I too care about my points... but that's immaterial.

I can confirm that the results will be -1,0,1 on SQL 2000, 2005, 2008 and 2008 R2 I didn't even need to run the code.

Identity (seed, increment) was obviossly typoed.

I picked the closest answer... -1,-0,1

I seem to recall that you could get a -0 answer back in the old days of C, but maybe it was a different language.

In either case, I like to look at my % of correct points and compare them to the group. It makes me feel as though I belong here. 🙂

--Mark Tassin
MCITP - SQL Server DBA
Proud member of the Anti-RBAR alliance.
For help with Performance click this link[/url]
For tips on how to post your problems[/url]

lbrigham SSCommitted Points: 1567 More actions · Answer 10

In case anyone hasn't caught it yet, either question or the answer is wrong. If both the seed and increment are -1, then the answer would be -1, -2, -3. As written the answer is -1, 0, 1...

or did someone else already mention this?

Aaron N. Cutshall SSCrazy Eights Points: 9017 More actions · Answer 11

cfradenburg (6/28/2010)
Right. However, I just read through 7 pages of mostly repeated posts about what the correct answer is seeing if a mod had already addressed anything. At some point that stops being pointing out an issue so it's known and can be corrected and becomes whining that isn't productive in the least. If you forgive a mistake you don't keep telling someone that it's wrong as people have been doing here.

I can see what you're saying and I agree. I don't think that EVERYONE needs to point out just how wrong the answer (or question, depending on your perspective) is since it's been already stated in many ways over numerous posts.

However, I also perceive that folks feel a need to post a comment here in order to get their points awarded. I don't know of anywhere that it's stated that a post is required if you answered a QOD correctly but points were not awarded. Perhaps that's where the confusion lies. I admit that I don't know the answer to that particular question, hence my own post just in case.

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sqlrv
Website: https://www.sqlrv.com

srikantht.dev SSC-Addicted Points: 473 More actions · Answer 12

none of the options provided are correct for identity col(-1,1)

the correct answer is (-1,0,1)

Please check before you post.

Thanks

Voitek Ten Centuries Points: 1366 More actions · Answer 13

What the heck!? Was it supposed to be identity (-1,-1)?

I wrote it out in SQL and my server returns -1, 0, 1. What's the deal?

Hugo Kornelis SSC Guru Points: 64790 More actions · Answer 14

lbrigham (6/28/2010)
or did someone else already mention this?

:rolleyes:

Aaron N. Cutshall (6/28/2010)
However, I also perceive that folks feel a need to post a comment here in order to get their points awarded. I don't know of anywhere that it's stated that a post is required if you answered a QOD correctly but points were not awarded. Perhaps that's where the confusion lies. I admit that I don't know the answer to that particular question, hence my own post just in case.

If points are awarded back, they are given to all who have answered the question. Even to those who chose an answer that everyone agrees to be incorrect. As I understand it, that is a limitation of the software; it can award points to everyone, but not to a selection.

Your confusion comes from posters who claim they "post to get their point". That refers to the fact that every post made also awards a point. Not in the QotD category, but in the "Forum posters" category, as well as in the "Overall leaderboard". They compensate the loss of a point in one category by scoring a point in another category. And so, a system designed to encourase cinmmunity participation ends up resulting in numerous posts that once, a long time ago, when Compuserve still was an alive and kicking community, were mockingly referred to as "<aol>Me too!</aol>"

srikantht.dev (6/28/2010)
Please check before you post.

<sigh>

Please read the existing replies before you post.

Hugo Kornelis, SQL Server/Data Platform MVP (2006-2016)
Visit my SQL Server blog: https://sqlserverfast.com/blog/
SQL Server Execution Plan Reference: https://sqlserverfast.com/epr/

Duncan Pryde SSCertifiable Points: 7956 More actions · Answer 15

Changing the subject somewhat...

Although I knew that you can have negative seeds and increments for the IDENTITY property, I've never actually used them myself.

I'd therefore be interested to hear if anyone else had used them, and in what sort of situations?

Duncan