November 15, 2006 at 7:32 am
what is the easiest & effective way to take the backup & restore it.
November 15, 2006 at 7:53 am
depends
i use veritas and like it, a lot of people here backup to disk and then to tape. where i work they don't want to spend the money for disk and tape. there are also some disk to disk backup applications like Evault and Avamar (now EMC) that are very slick
November 15, 2006 at 9:42 am
"the easiest & [most] effective way" means a lot of different things to a lot of different DBA's in different environments...
Questions to ask yourself...
What am I backing up,
How Often,
what is my Recovery point objective (how much data can I lose, do I need to get back to this morning, or a point in time)
what is my Recovery time objective (how fast do I need to get everything back up and running after a failure)
Answering these questions will go along way into us being bale to suggest alternatives to you.
If you're just backing up a small SQL server database, perhaps the native backup tools, maintenance plans etc will suit your needs.
If you have a large database and you need your backups to happen quickly and be very compressed then perhaps you may want to look into a product that will help with those things. Something like Litespeed from Quest may be of value to you.
Basically "it depends", although not the answer you are looking for is the best answer I can give you with no more information to go on.
November 15, 2006 at 1:52 pm
Detach, copy, attach.
November 15, 2006 at 1:55 pm
but then the db is offline while you are backing it up
September 18, 2007 at 5:57 am
MICROSOFT SQL SERVER
Greg Robidoux, Contributor
04.12.2005
Rating: -3.88- (out of 5)
In a previous tip we discussed the different recovery models SQL Server offers and decision points on which to base your recovery model selection. After you've selected the appropriate recovery model, you need to put in place the proper backup strategy to minimize data loss and downtime in case of a database failure. I have seen many database installations wherein the correct recovery model is in place to minimize data loss, but the correct backup options and plans are not in place. Often the Full Recovery model is selected, but the only backups occurring are full backups. Occasionally, the Simple Recovery model is selected, even though the customer base could not afford to lose all transactions since the last full backup. Creating a full backup once a day probably makes a lot of sense to most people, but that should only be the beginning of your backup strategy. We will take a look at some of the components to help define a backup strategy as well as the different backup options that are available. First, let's look at the backup options: Database (Full)
Transaction
Differential
Others
Unfortunately, SQL Server does not have an option for simply setting up a backup model like it does for the recovery model. It would be nice if you could just select a backup model from a drop-down list. The closest thing to that is Maintenance Plans, but the options in Maintenance Plans do not give you the choice of doing Differential backups, and you still need to set the proper backup schedule. Based on the recovery model you have selected, you now have to choose which type of backups to run -- but more importantly, the time and frequency of the backups. So, what is the best backup model to use for your database? If you are using the Simple Recovery model:
If you are using the Full or Bulk-Logged Recovery model:
How to implement your backup model You can run backups manually, but the best approach is to schedule backups using SQL Agent. Once you set up the backup job, let SQL Agent run the backups on a set schedule. This can be done one of three ways:
<>
<> Summary The types of backups and the schedule you use will allow you to control how much data could be lost in case of a failure as well as the time it takes to do a recovery. Using Differential backups could dramatically decrease the time it takes to do a restore of your database and get your users up and running quicker. Using Maintenance Plans is also a place to start, but take the time to get familiar with all of the backup options and then select a plan that matches your business goals. |
MICROSOFT SQL SERVER
Selecting a SQL Server recovery model
Greg Robidoux
03.22.2005
Rating: -4.36- (out of 5)
SQL Server 2000 offers three recovery models for each database: full recovery, simple recovery and bulk-logged recovery. The recovery models determine how much data loss is acceptable in case of a failure and what types of backup and restore functions are allowed. Most people either select full or simple for all of their databases and just stick with the same option across the board. In most cases, selecting the full recovery model is the smartest option, because it gives you the greatest flexibility and minimizes data loss in the event a restore has to take place. Although using the full recovery model makes logical sense, there are reasons why the other two options are available. We will further define why there are three options and when you might want to use the different options to protect your databases. First, let's take a closer look at each model. Simple The simple recovery model allows you to recover data only to the most recent full database or differential backup. Transaction log backups are not available because the contents of the transaction log are truncated each time a checkpoint is issued for the database. Full The full recovery model uses database backups and transaction log backups to provide complete protection against failure. Along with being able to restore a full or differential backup, you can recover the database to the point of failure or to a specific point in time. All operations, including bulk operations such as SELECT INTO, CREATE INDEX and bulk-loading data, are fully logged and recoverable. Bulk-Logged The bulk-logged recovery model provides protection against failure combined with the best performance. In order to get better performance, the following operations are minimally logged and not fully recoverable: SELECT INTO, bulk-load operations, CREATE INDEX as well as text and image operations. Under the bulk-logged recovery model, a damaged data file can result in having to redo work manually based on the operations that are not fully logged. In addition, the bulk-logged recovery model only allows the database to be recovered to the end of a transaction log backup when the log backup contains bulk changes. So once again, based on the information above it looks like the Full Recovery model is the way to go. Given the flexibility of the full recovery model, why would you ever select any other model? The following factors will help you determine when another model could work for you: Select Simple if:
Select Bulk-Logged if:
Select Full if:
Switching recovery models For some databases, you may need to use a combination of these recovery models. Let's say you have a critical system and you cannot afford to lose any data during daily operations; but during off hours there are maintenance tasks and data loads that use way too much transaction log space to log every transaction. In a case like this, you may want to switch recovery models prior to your maintenance tasks. This can be automated using T-SQL in the job that runs your maintenance or data load tasks. After the maintenance task is completed, the recovery model can be switched back again. Switching between full and bulk-logged models is probably the best scenario for changing recovery models and also the safest and easiest. You can switch from any recovery model to another recovery model, but prior to or after the switch, you may need to issue additional transaction log or full backups to ensure you have a complete backup set. How to change recovery models There are two options that can be used to switch recovery models.
· T-SQL ALTER DATABASE Northwind SET RECOVERY FULL GO
Summary As you can see, the three recovery models each have a different purpose. If you are still unsure which recovery model to select, I recommend using the full recovery model and issuing both full and transaction log backups throughout the day. It becomes a little more complex to do both full and transaction log restores, but in case there is a failure in the middle of the day, you will appreciate the flexibility of point-in-time recovery. |
N.B : http://searchsqlserver.techtarget.com/generic/0,295582,sid87_gci1157131,00.html
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply