January 20, 2009 at 9:48 pm
Steve Jones - Editor (1/20/2009)
VMs don't kill servers, server administrators kill servers.Don't blame VMS, it's an ignorance thing, same as any other new tool we get. Usually we give them to the "Simple Jacks" of the world, regardless of whether they understand what they're getting or not.
Oh, I agree... it's not the fault of VM... it's the people who aren't thinking on my end. It just turns out that most of the people who aren't thinking are also involved in VM... it made it too easy for them to take control without taking the responsibility of control.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 21, 2009 at 4:30 am
I think you are seriously underestimating the number of people that are not thinking.
January 21, 2009 at 6:28 am
Michael Earl (1/21/2009)
I think you are seriously underestimating the number of people that are not thinking.
Not sure what you mean by that, Michael...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 21, 2009 at 6:35 am
Hi Guys
2 weeks, much extreme, we have got VM on production machine, i have a template that has got Win2003 and SQL 2005, i can deploy a VM from that template, it takes me 10-15 minutes minutes, this is because my ESX are over loaded and i have got a pre historic SAN :D, after that i need to change IP assign to N/W and all other small things, usually i can set up a machine and ready for production within an hour :), as suggested timings dosen't include internal Politics 😎
January 21, 2009 at 7:54 am
I think Michael means most people don't think.
January 21, 2009 at 7:58 am
Steve Jones - Editor (1/21/2009)
I think Michael means most people don't think.
That sums up my opinion.
At the very least, I think it is pretty clear that there are many dumb people that have nothing to do with VM.
January 21, 2009 at 6:42 pm
Ok... still not sure what you mean, so I'll come right out and ask... Do you think I'm part of the problem on this one?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 22, 2009 at 4:24 am
Jeff Moden (1/21/2009)
Ok... still not sure what you mean, so I'll come right out and ask... Do you think I'm part of the problem on this one?
No, sorry. You are reading too much into my flip comment. You clearly use your head. I was just noting that (at least in most of the places I have worked) it's not just VM attracting slow people.
January 22, 2009 at 5:21 am
Michael Earl (1/22/2009)
Jeff Moden (1/21/2009)
Ok... still not sure what you mean, so I'll come right out and ask... Do you think I'm part of the problem on this one?No, sorry. You are reading too much into my flip comment. You clearly use your head. I was just noting that (at least in most of the places I have worked) it's not just VM attracting slow people.
Sorry, Michael... I should have known better especially coming from someone like yourself. There's been a rash of sarcastic remarks about certain things here and a couple of work places I'm involved in and, now, when someone good says something right, I've found myself questioning it. Man, I gotta get over that!
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 22, 2009 at 5:26 am
especially coming from someone like yourself
That the heck is that supposed to mean?
Once again - just kidding.
January 22, 2009 at 6:20 am
Jeff, I'm sure you're part of the problem 😛
but hopefully more part of the solution!
January 22, 2009 at 7:26 pm
Michael Earl (1/22/2009)
especially coming from someone like yourselfThat the heck is that supposed to mean?
Once again - just kidding.
See? That's what I mean... 😛 I'm just about that gun-shy for the last couple of days. :hehe:
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 22, 2009 at 7:28 pm
Steve Jones - Editor (1/22/2009)
Jeff, I'm sure you're part of the problem 😛
Exactly... if it weren't for me asking for stuff they said they could provide, they wouldn't have a problem at all. 😛
I did find out who like pork chops, though. 😀
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 17, 2009 at 12:38 pm
[font="Verdana"]Setting up a VM (the first time) should take a little more time than setting up a physical server from the point of view that you have to set up the physical server, and then create the physical environment (partition farm, etc) for the virtual environments. Thereafter, a new VM should be quick, particularly if you can clone an existing VM.
I would expect 2 days should be adequate to get everything set up the first time, and 2 hours for subsequent VMs. On the other hand, if your organisation is anything like mine, doing the necessary paperwork and getting everything cleared and so on could well take 2 months...
It's the people side that's slow.
[/font]
Viewing 14 posts - 16 through 28 (of 28 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply