December 20, 2011 at 8:35 am
Several good tidbits in here, including demonstrating how important code formatting is for readability. 🙂
Thanks for a good question.
December 20, 2011 at 8:57 am
GilaMonster (12/20/2011)
Hmm, this looks familiar. 😉
Seemed familiar from a tweet conversation involving you.:cool:
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
December 20, 2011 at 8:58 am
R.P.Rozema (12/20/2011)
:). Yes, that's how this question got to be: I did it wrong myself. And so far almost half of the people who tried, had it wrong too. To their avail, the ill-formatted answers don't help them...Once more, thanks for your assistance.
Meh - not too concerned about the answer format. Still a good question.
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
December 20, 2011 at 9:19 am
tks - good question
December 20, 2011 at 10:32 am
Good question.
The formatting didn't bother me a whole lot since I did what I usually do with this type of question. I ran along comparing them line by line to see what the differences were. Once I knew what the differences were I knew what columns you were testing on and could easily go from there. I never really tried to interpret the queries as a whole.
I do love system table questions though. Always a lot of fun.
Kenneth FisherI was once offered a wizards hat but it got in the way of my dunce cap.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------For better, quicker answers on T-SQL questions, click on the following... http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Best+Practices/61537/[/url]For better answers on performance questions, click on the following... http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/SQLServerCentral/66909/[/url]Link to my Blog Post --> www.SQLStudies.com[/url]
December 20, 2011 at 10:41 am
Nice question on something I don't believe I've ever thought much about. I learned something!
Thanks, can't wait for your next!
December 20, 2011 at 1:12 pm
Nice question. Keep 'em coming!
December 21, 2011 at 4:01 am
Good question. The formatting wasn't an issue for me, I just pasted the answers into notepad and started to put line breaks and spaces where I would put them if writing SQL - and realised before I finished that I would be wasting time doing any more formatting as the four answer options were identical apart form a couple of column names, which made it all pretty clear (apart from remembering which of the column ids was the id in the parent table).
I think the explanation is slightly wrong, though, as it seems to suggest that key_ordinal is the same as index_column_id in all entries in sys.index_columns for anything except columns of clustered indexes; but actually this can only be true for key columns, since for non-key columns key_ordinal is always 0.
Tom
December 22, 2011 at 4:12 am
Thank you for the question
Iulian
Viewing 9 posts - 16 through 23 (of 23 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply