May 12, 2020 at 6:04 pm
OK, let me address a few things for you.
The only good way I have, or others have, now is to dig around and look for things that might be set to admin only. I don't have a good feel for how to do that with WordPress, and limited time, but it's something to investigate a bit and see what's "staged" and not released.
I have listened to complaints from hundred (not dozens) of users over the years on the UI and useability. The old forums were routinely brought up by many casual users. Not those of you on here every day, but people that mostly get the newsletter, read an article and once in awhile post a question. For every complaint from you, Jeff, and others, I've gotten literally hundreds from community members. Most people, and I say this from experience aside from my own, find the old version of the forums clunky and hard to use.
Re:this layout, I would say the complaints v praise is about on par. I'll note that in my experience of nearly 20 years here, more people complain than praise, but when I hear praise, it's usually in person.
May 12, 2020 at 8:28 pm
Are there other admin only features? Possibly. I'm sure there are some, and some aren't likely to be released because they're admin things, but we often do test some things as admin only.
The point here was not to request admin like features but to ask if there were things that non-admins should be seeing/accessing but are not for whatever reason and if so then maybe that could help explain why the forums appear good to go to you but not to at least some of the non-admin users. I am assuming that the thing missing for Phil as shown in his post is not an Admin only thing.
Addressing your issues. I am happy to address specifics, but "a step back" or " It was terrible, trash-ware, and we all knew " is a very general, useless from a software design perspective. When we have engaged users with specific complaints, they are often as emotional and irrational as helpful in finding real issues. too often I've dug into a complaint across hours, only to find it isn't nearly as big an issue as someone makes it out and they're more upset about their specific thing. If you have a specific, this doesn't work well, I do encourage you to post specific issues in this forum (not this thread/topic). I will respond and give a reason or status on them
Of the points you made this is one that I'm going to have to correct you on. I never called the SQL Server Central User forum trash-ware. I listed a personal example where I refereed to software I had to use at a previous job as trash-ware and that was in regards to a story about the issue with needed change not happening because of employees fear of being accused (by management) of not being a "team player". I was hoping that something like that, a resistance to needed change for fear of being labeled "not a team player" was not happening with this website.
You say that you've moved to bbPress, which is themed more like Stack Overflow or many modern sites but if you look at stack-overflow and then compare it to this forum they look nothing alike. Stack-overflow is a rich user forum that has a clean setup. There are many options (although I don't see a preview mode/option) and the layout is tight and easy to follow.
When you compare sqlservercentral.com to Stack-Overlfow its a lot easier to see the problems. In short, the user forums at sqlservercentral.com looks more like a simplified forum designed for end users working on mobile devices where as stackoverflow's forums looks like its meant for the workstation warrior. If sqlserevercentral.com's user forum looked and worked like stackoverflow you'd still have some problems but it would be a far better and more dev-user friendly website.
If I didn't care I wouldn't bother taking the time to tell you about any of this and I imagine the same can be said for Jef Moden. The bottom line is that the current user forums for this website is lacking in the kind of features/functionality you;d typically find with a more developer savvy like website.
Kindest Regards,
Just say No to Facebook!May 13, 2020 at 6:47 am
Hello,
I wonder if there is a way to print the whole topic, consisting of multiple pages in 1 shot. This option used to be available in the prior version of the forum. I sent this question few times to webmaster@sqlservercentral.com in the last 3-4 months, but no reply.
ty
May 13, 2020 at 12:34 pm
@Steve...
No... this is not like stack overflow especially not when it comes to publishing code nor in rendering previous published code (how hard would it be to overcome the quadruple spacing of old code? I suspect it's a search and replace of Cr/Lf with just Lf). I get that you wanted to "improve the paint job" on the forum but the project was stopped way short in many areas (which I'd prefer to not regenerate the list for... you already know what they are).
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 13, 2020 at 2:54 pm
There isn't a print feature for the whole topic. We haven't had enough call for printing to implement that.
May 13, 2020 at 3:18 pm
Re: SO, If I look at the two sites, I don't see a ton of difference. They are more tag based, while we are forum based, but I'd like specifics. The comments are still general, not what thing or what specific feature you think is implemented poorly or incorrectly.
As an example, their home page:, the right side is ad stuff, so I've ignored it
Here is ours, a similar view in the active threads
It's different, but is it not very similar? If you think not, what things do you think would be different. Kerning/spacing is a very arguable point. If you look at an individual question/topic, I'm not sure I see substantial differences. I see differences, but they are both very minimal layouts compared to most forums.
I didn't mean to imply that you were calling SSC trashware. I apologize if that was the case. Rather, that comment or description of a problem with software is unhelpful. It's an emotional or a disparaging remark without detail. Too many of the complaints or comments I've gotten are without detail. I'm not picking on you, or Jeff, or anyone specifically, but most people generally. It's helped me to realize how often I've been upset with customers giving me work and not realizing how hard it is, or how much work it can be to accurately describe what you mean and communicate clearly an issue.
May 13, 2020 at 4:35 pm
Correct... it doesn't look much different. It's when you try to use the forum and related functionality. Their stuff works better than ours do. Sometimes, ours doesn't work at all.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 13, 2020 at 8:20 pm
p.s. I'm probably a minority here but I hate the look of StackOverflow and similar sites. Everyone has gone that way to support mobile (i.e. smart phones) and so don't expect to be heard there because the herd thinks otherwise.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 13, 2020 at 8:37 pm
I made it clear I wasn't a fan when SSC went to the new version, but to me it is still light years better than SO. IMHO 🙂
-------------------------------------------------------------
we travel not to escape life but for life not to escape us
Don't fear failure, fear regret.
May 15, 2020 at 2:04 pm
I think we have to suck it up with this "mobile first". Obviously the smart move would be to serve up a mobile site when a mobile useragent presents itself and furthermore, I would guess that a website for SQL people would lean toward the desktop because SQL folks do not spend their day running big servers on a flippin iphone LOL
But techies aren't in charge, theres probably a marketroid at redgate that thinks all we do is look for "hot singles in our area."
At least we don't have "infinite scroll" man I hate that concept.
May 15, 2020 at 2:56 pm
The marketing and SEO do matter. Engagement is a part of what is needed and mobile has been a constant request over the years. This also affects search results from Bing/Google/etc. Certainly that was part of the decision to change.
October 9, 2021 at 11:03 am
This was removed by the editor as SPAM
Viewing 12 posts - 16 through 26 (of 26 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply