September 26, 2011 at 9:33 pm
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Use of BETWEEN and DATETIME
September 26, 2011 at 9:57 pm
Straight forward question. Thanks.
Thanks
September 26, 2011 at 10:06 pm
Thanks for the question.
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
September 26, 2011 at 10:06 pm
Thanks for the question
M&M
September 27, 2011 at 12:12 am
A little bit tricky. For me it's impossible to notice the reverted order of assignments before a coffee.
September 27, 2011 at 12:22 am
Failed (before coffee :doze: ). Urrrggghhh...
September 27, 2011 at 12:36 am
I missed it. My bad for not reading the code accurately enough.
Though, with the reversed order of the assignments, one might ownder if the author was trying to educate us something, or if he was us trying to trick us. I would have liked the question more without that trick,
September 27, 2011 at 12:59 am
Interesting Question, revising about the issue. Thanks.
September 27, 2011 at 1:40 am
OK, if I'd read the question a bit more carefully I would have noticed the reversed assignments.
However, I do wonder if the principal purpose of QOTD is to trick or to educate. If it is to trick, this question worked perfectly with me. If it is to educate, I'm less sure...
September 27, 2011 at 1:40 am
Failed! - Got too fixated about the time element and missed the order of the between dates
-------------------------------Posting Data Etiquette - Jeff Moden [/url]Smart way to ask a question
There are naive questions, tedious questions, ill-phrased questions, questions put after inadequate self-criticism. But every question is a cry to understand (the world). There is no such thing as a dumb question. ― Carl Sagan
I would never join a club that would allow me as a member - Groucho Marx
September 27, 2011 at 1:51 am
Thank you for the question,
Regards,
Iulian
September 27, 2011 at 2:13 am
Thanks for the question - I have to agree though, that the effort in the question seems more set to trick than to test actual knowledge.
Guess it makes one double and triple check all questions, as it was set up to be an interesting question even without the trick aspect! I wonder how many people would have got the right answer even without the trick?
September 27, 2011 at 2:18 am
A trick question with @DATE1 and @DATE2 being swapped but shows the care that is needed when having similar named fields.
September 27, 2011 at 2:55 am
Of course, failing the question I will argue that this question should be under the category (yet to be added) READING... 😉
September 27, 2011 at 3:16 am
Dwayne - hope everbody out there is a Red Dwarf fan.
The Cat.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 66 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply