September 21, 2011 at 8:23 pm
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Union results
September 21, 2011 at 10:31 pm
Thanks for the question.
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
September 22, 2011 at 12:33 am
Thank you for the question,
Regards,
Iulian
September 22, 2011 at 1:21 am
Very simple. Thanks. 🙂
September 22, 2011 at 1:40 am
This was removed by the editor as SPAM
September 22, 2011 at 2:06 am
Good question, thanks.
M&M
September 22, 2011 at 5:48 am
Good questions - thanks
-------------------------------Posting Data Etiquette - Jeff Moden [/url]Smart way to ask a question
There are naive questions, tedious questions, ill-phrased questions, questions put after inadequate self-criticism. But every question is a cry to understand (the world). There is no such thing as a dumb question. ― Carl Sagan
I would never join a club that would allow me as a member - Groucho Marx
September 22, 2011 at 5:58 am
thanks for the question!
September 22, 2011 at 5:59 am
Good straight forward question. Thanks for posting it.
http://brittcluff.blogspot.com/
September 22, 2011 at 6:42 am
Ha! My reasoning was right, but apparently I need some more caffeine so I can count. 🙂
September 22, 2011 at 7:09 am
Lost the point but learned something new.
I knew that union deduped the sets, but I never thought it through to the logical conclusion that it dedups all rows in all sets. Makes sense though.
Thanks for stretching my brain this morning.
September 22, 2011 at 7:25 am
Tony++ (9/22/2011)
Lost the point but learned something new.I knew that union deduped the sets, but I never thought it through to the logical conclusion that it dedups all rows in all sets. Makes sense though.
Thanks for stretching my brain this morning.
Well, technically it doesn't dedupe all rows in all sets. It dedupes all of the rows in the output. It essentially performs a DISTINCT operation on the final intermediate data set.
September 22, 2011 at 8:00 am
Daniel Bowlin (9/22/2011)
Ha! My reasoning was right, but apparently I need some more caffeine so I can count. 🙂
Yes, I saw 1,2,3 and almost forgot to count the null value. Good straight forward question with all the likely wrong answers.
September 22, 2011 at 8:47 am
Thanks - Nice easy question to kick of the day.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 27 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply