September 3, 2008 at 1:38 pm
Didn't think to look at pages, just checked the total size. Yeah, a page fragment is the reason. Makes sense. Either way, including the clustered index in the non-clustered index didn't increase the size.
- Gus "GSquared", RSVP, OODA, MAP, NMVP, FAQ, SAT, SQL, DNA, RNA, UOI, IOU, AM, PM, AD, BC, BCE, USA, UN, CF, ROFL, LOL, ETC
Property of The Thread
"Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everyone agrees it's old enough to know better." - Anon
September 3, 2008 at 6:40 pm
bcronce (8/28/2008)
kind of off topic but when you saidit is just a time stamp, thus all distinct
are time stamps guaranteed unique or 'just as long as you don't do 2+ successive inserts really fast'?
Wrong kind of time stamp... he's not talking about the datatype...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
Viewing 2 posts - 16 through 16 (of 16 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply