July 17, 2011 at 12:24 pm
bopeavy (7/16/2011)
. . .
This is what I got:
About 0 results (0.04 seconds)
July 17, 2011 at 12:42 pm
Revenant (7/17/2011)
bopeavy (7/16/2011)
. . .This is what I got:
About 0 results (0.04 seconds)
Optimized Query! (Truncate All Tables!)
Never stop learning, even if it hurts. Ego bruises are practically mandatory as you learn unless you've never risked enough to make a mistake.
For better assistance in answering your questions[/url] | Forum Netiquette
For index/tuning help, follow these directions.[/url] |Tally Tables[/url]
Twitter: @AnyWayDBA
July 17, 2011 at 1:01 pm
Craig Farrell (7/17/2011)
Revenant (7/17/2011)
bopeavy (7/16/2011)
. . .This is what I got:
About 0 results (0.04 seconds)Optimized Query! (Truncate All Tables!)
Call it "data amnesty." 🙂
July 17, 2011 at 2:13 pm
MCITP DBA 2008 (took long enough to get the courage to take it 🙂 )
Peter Trast
Microsoft Certified ...(insert many literal strings here)
Microsoft Design Architect with Alexander Open Systems
July 17, 2011 at 2:20 pm
Peter Trast (7/17/2011)
MCITP DBA 2008 (took long enough to get the courage to take it 🙂 )
Not getting it - a data amnesty? (I could use some...)
July 17, 2011 at 2:32 pm
Revenant (7/17/2011)
bopeavy (7/16/2011)
. . .This is what I got:
About 0 results (0.04 seconds)
That's because google knows that 1 is about 0. Did you look at the 1 result actually provided after that header line?
"About 0 results (0.03 seconds)" [my google is faster that your google] when 1 result is dispalyed??? Bad Goodle! :w00t:
Tom
July 17, 2011 at 2:35 pm
Tom.Thomson (7/17/2011)
Revenant (7/17/2011)
bopeavy (7/16/2011)
. . .This is what I got:
About 0 results (0.04 seconds)That's because google knows that 1 is about 0. Did you look at the 1 result actually provided after that header line?
"About 0 results (0.03 seconds)" [my google is faster that your google] when 1 result is dispalyed??? Bad Goodle! :w00t:
In my case, no results displayed; sorry.
July 17, 2011 at 2:37 pm
Tom.Thomson (7/17/2011)
Revenant (7/17/2011)
bopeavy (7/16/2011)
. . .This is what I got:
About 0 results (0.04 seconds)That's because google knows that 1 is about 0. Did you look at the 1 result actually provided after that header line?
"About 0 results (0.03 seconds)" [my google is faster that your google] when 1 result is dispalyed??? Bad Goodle! :w00t:
(Darn, I always think of a better reply, once I click Post)
0 = 1 for extremely high values of 0.
July 17, 2011 at 2:45 pm
Revenant (7/17/2011)
Tom.Thomson (7/17/2011)
That's because google knows that 1 is about 0. Did you look at the 1 result actually provided after that header line?"About 0 results (0.03 seconds)" [my google is faster that your google] when 1 result is dispalyed??? Bad Goodle! :w00t:
(Darn, I always think of a better reply, once I click Post)
0 = 1 for extremely high values of 0.
Drat, I wish I'd thought of that!
I wonder why Google gives me a result but doesn't give you one. I would suspect language preferences, but the result is in English so probably not that. Can't think of any other reason.
Tom
July 17, 2011 at 3:03 pm
Tom.Thomson (7/17/2011)
. . . I wonder why Google gives me a result but doesn't give you one. I would suspect language preferences, but the result is in English so probably not that. Can't think of any other reason.
Check the answer at http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/disable-googles-personalization-search-results/.
July 17, 2011 at 5:15 pm
Revenant (7/17/2011)
Tom.Thomson (7/17/2011)
. . . I wonder why Google gives me a result but doesn't give you one. I would suspect language preferences, but the result is in English so probably not that. Can't think of any other reason.Check the answer at http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/disable-googles-personalization-search-results/.
Interesting. But that page provides no answer.
I have no google login, so that ain't it. I deleted all browsing history and restarted the browser, and got the same result, so that ain't it. Unless of course you have a googlr login with some weird settings, or some google browsing history that makes this result invisible. Or maybe it's because my preferred language isn't English that it gives me this |English language result that it doesn't give you?
Tom
July 18, 2011 at 5:27 am
bcsims 90437 (7/15/2011)
Squash, Splat, and Eat
Roadkill?
Armadillo!
-Ki
July 18, 2011 at 6:21 am
Back!!! (from vacation, that is -- what'd I miss?)
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Check out my blog at https://pianorayk.wordpress.com/
July 18, 2011 at 6:50 am
Ray K (7-18-2011)
Back!!! (from vacation, that is -- what'd I miss?)
Foward!
July 18, 2011 at 7:57 am
bopeavy (7/18/2011)
Ray K (7-18-2011)
Back!!! (from vacation, that is -- what'd I miss?)Foward!
Fast
Viewing 15 posts - 4,696 through 4,710 (of 21,190 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply