December 16, 2008 at 3:36 am
Sounds to me like the SAN is caching the transactions and not doing the write operation when the tran goes through. Therefore SQL thinks its done but it isnt.
Check the write-ahead settings and consider balance loading the SAN controller switches (assuming you use two).
Have seen issues like that when load testing our new cluster. SQL handeled everything we through at it but the load on the SAN disks was enough to send Exchange RPC latency to 50+. We solved it by balancing the load of various servers between our two SAN switches.
Speak to your SAN guys and see what they think.
Adam Zacks-------------------------------------------Be Nice, Or Leave
January 28, 2009 at 3:33 am
I've had this error recently on SQL Server 2005 SP2. It seems to have been a function of installing Diskeeper 2009 Server Edition (Diskeeper 2008 Server Edition works fine). They have included some additional defragmentation methods in the latest release.
I'm guessing that in this case SQL doesn't cope with the fact that the underlying data files (MDF in my case) may have physically moved on the disk.
As per previous posts there are a number of other potential causes too.
.
January 31, 2009 at 9:49 am
For SAN drives: Check for HBA reset messages in your system or adapter logs
For local drives: Usually an IO issues or possibility a error on the disk that check disk would not pick up.
😎
Thanks guy for leading me in the right directions.
February 10, 2009 at 7:29 am
We are g etting this problem as well AND just applied Diskeeper 2009 Admin Server tool to the server.
I am going to remove the diskeeper product, restart the SQL server and then give an earful to Diskeeper support 😉
February 10, 2009 at 8:23 am
Interesting that you have got the same problem. I was 90% sure that Diskeeper 2009 had prompted it but not certain.
Note that the problem machine was SQL Server 2005 SP2 NOT SP3.
Can you confirm which your machine is?
Also as per my previous post Diskeeper 2008 seems fine.
I'd be very interested in your outcome with Diskeeper so please post it.
Thanks
.
February 10, 2009 at 8:25 am
Will do...It is SQL Server 2005 SP2 I haven't done any applying of any new service packs
This didn't have a problem with 2008 diskeeper
Sent tech case with support will update when I find something.
February 10, 2009 at 8:28 am
Great, thanks
.
February 17, 2009 at 3:52 pm
Interesting.. Will wait for the answer..
Ajay Prakash
February 18, 2009 at 11:04 am
****Got an answer!!! *******:w00t:
On the phone with Diskeeper they ARE able to duplicate the stack dump problem. Tech support indicates that 2009 version is holding on to various sql binaries which is causing the dumps.
They are sending me the latest build for me to test. I can test this on a non-critical production server (just has network tools, backup exec) awaiting the email from diskeeper will update again after I apply the latest build
but by the sounds of it they don't seem to have the cause of this problem yet.
February 19, 2009 at 2:13 pm
Update---
Installed 839 build of Diskeeper 2009 on a SQL Server 2005 with SP2 and after 18 hours no stack dump. Continue to monitoring the situation. Not sure if Diskeeper will push this as an update...
more to follow...
February 23, 2009 at 2:41 am
Thanks for the update. The Diskeeper build that failed for me was 13.0.835. It sounds like you are running a later one.
Diskeeper asked me for some further information early last week, but I was on holiday so haven't supplied it yet. Since they requested it you have made progress .. which is excellent.
I'd like to make sure that the guy handling my case (Naveen Julien Louis) is aware of your case to save time collating information that may be irrelevant.
Have you a named contact at Diskeeper support I can give him?
Thanks.
.
February 23, 2009 at 7:33 am
My support ticket number is 16723622 and Ben Fiandaca is my tech support rep. I must now place this build within the administration and then push out to the servers.
February 23, 2009 at 7:44 am
Thank you very much for your help. I have emailed my contact with the information supplied.
I gather that since you are now putting the build into production, you must be happy with it!
.
February 23, 2009 at 7:48 am
Well yes and no, it is on our SQL server that has several 'grunt' programs..I haven't yet taken the dive to put it on our ERP server yet but I will update again my progress..
February 27, 2009 at 4:53 am
I've just had connection loss on a SQL 2000 SP4 box that has recently had Diskeeper 2009 Enterprise trialled on it. Have now removed the product again.
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 36 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply