July 16, 2014 at 8:14 pm
Comments posted to this topic are about the item The Size of the Data Pages in SQL Server
---------------------------------------------------
"Thare are only 10 types of people in the world:
Those who understand binary, and those who don't."
July 17, 2014 at 1:03 am
Nice and easy question, thanks.
Need an answer? No, you need a question
My blog at https://sqlkover.com.
MCSE Business Intelligence - Microsoft Data Platform MVP
July 17, 2014 at 2:39 am
This was removed by the editor as SPAM
July 17, 2014 at 3:17 am
It was so easy it took at least 20 minutes research to make sure there wasn't a catch. I must have checked half the documentation and writing about page sizes to find a 'but in this case...'.
How to post a question to get the most help http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Best+Practices/61537
July 17, 2014 at 3:31 am
Though, the answer is NO , still wanted to make sure that there no catch or new enhancement in sql server 2014 π
July 17, 2014 at 3:41 am
Good Knowledge base question. Thanks for sharing
July 17, 2014 at 4:57 am
twin.devil (7/17/2014)
Good Knowledge base question. Thanks for sharing
Absoulately agree here π
Thanks & Best Regards,
Hany Helmy
SQL Server Database Consultant
July 17, 2014 at 4:59 am
a basic concept but it worth to be remembered
Thanks
July 17, 2014 at 5:48 am
July 17, 2014 at 8:36 am
domenico.delbrocco (7/17/2014)
a basic concept but it worth to be rememberedThanks
+1
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
July 17, 2014 at 9:43 am
Thank you for the post, very interesting one.
I had an idea on 8k size but never had an idea that there will-be/can-be a change option or can be changed and was wondering if it really can?... I had my doubts and I went with NO.... well; π
ww; Raghu
--
The first and the hardest SQL statement I have wrote- "select * from customers" - and I was happy and felt smart.
July 17, 2014 at 2:03 pm
Stewart "Arturius" Campbell (7/17/2014)
Nice, straightforward one, thanks.I have worked with numerous different RDBM's, and the page size is fixed in all of them.
Which in my mind begs the question of "Why?"
To cite another T-SQL RDBMS, Sybase's Advanced SQL Anywhere allows you to select the page size at database-creation time , with page size options up to 32KB. Obviously, bigger pages can have a significant impact on the I/O overhead, and Sybase's making it an option independent of the CPU type would seem to put the lie to claims of the restriction being necessary for "backward compatibility" with unnamed CPUs.
July 17, 2014 at 2:35 pm
Supereasy! Thanks!
July 17, 2014 at 11:24 pm
Thank you and appreciate all your time and interest in writing comments.
---------------------------------------------------
"Thare are only 10 types of people in the world:
Those who understand binary, and those who don't."
July 18, 2014 at 4:07 am
william-700725 (7/17/2014)Sybase's making it an option independent of the CPU type would seem to put the lie to claims of the restriction being necessary for "backward compatibility" with unnamed CPUs.
Yeah, that CPU page size explanation makes no sense whatsoever, especially since the x86 CPU line (which is obviously SQL Server's primary home) doesn't use 8Kb pages! They used to be 4Kb in the 386 and 486, then they added an option for 4Mb pages in the Pentium, and I think x86-64 CPUs add a 1Gb page option as well.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 16 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply