The new 3D Joins in SQL Server 2014

  • Has anyone tried out the new 3D joins in 2014?

  • Not sure what you're referring to.

    "The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
    - Theodore Roosevelt

    Author of:
    SQL Server Execution Plans
    SQL Server Query Performance Tuning

  • Can you provide detail or technical link for 3D joins in 2014?

    ---------------------------------------------------
    "Thare are only 10 types of people in the world:
    Those who understand binary, and those who don't."

  • I believe this is a late April Fools topic...

    Need an answer? No, you need a question
    My blog at https://sqlkover.com.
    MCSE Business Intelligence - Microsoft Data Platform MVP

  • Koen Verbeeck (4/2/2014)


    I believe this is a late April Fools topic...

    Correct 😛 found everything about it on BOL under AFD....

  • I looked at the topic and thought wahoo they've do some enhancements to spatial ... but of course the spatial stuff hasn't changed in 2014:( Made me look though:-)

  • Ah, was looking forward to using

    RIGHT ANGLE JOIN

    PERPENDICULAR JOIN

    🙂

  • Gazareth (4/9/2014)


    Ah, was looking forward to using

    RIGHT ANGLE JOIN

    PERPENDICULAR JOIN

    🙂

    I think I've seen that tried before... 🙂

  • Eirikur Eiriksson (4/1/2014)


    Has anyone tried out the new 3D joins in 2014?

    I can confirm that 3 dimensional joins work quite well; it's the 12 or 20 dimensional joins that are a pain. 😉

    "Do not seek to follow in the footsteps of the wise. Instead, seek what they sought." - Matsuo Basho

  • Eric M Russell (5/2/2014)


    Eirikur Eiriksson (4/1/2014)


    Has anyone tried out the new 3D joins in 2014?

    I can confirm that 3 dimensional joins work quite well; it's the 12 or 20 dimensional joins that are a pain. 😉

    Now it's more my jaw joints giving me problems 😀

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply