April 25, 2016 at 8:11 pm
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Tempdb Setup in SQL Server 2016
April 25, 2016 at 10:26 pm
New to me this, good question and thanks, looks like there have been significant improvements around TempDb.
...
April 26, 2016 at 3:43 am
Easy one, thanks!
Need an answer? No, you need a question
My blog at https://sqlkover.com.
MCSE Business Intelligence - Microsoft Data Platform MVP
April 26, 2016 at 5:09 am
Learned an update in 2016 version. Thanks for the question.
April 26, 2016 at 5:14 am
Got this one wrong, but definitely a new learning..!!!
April 26, 2016 at 6:17 am
This was talked about in a presentation I saw as an improvement for those that like to click Next...Next...Next. If that's what someone is doing, maybe they shouldn't be the one installing it. Nice question.
April 26, 2016 at 7:23 am
Nice question. Just one small problem.
Either the answer is wrong or the question is badly worded. The question asks how many files, but the answer tells us how many data files and doesn't count the log file. I think most people, given the options provided, will realise that its the number of data files that's wanted and so ought to get it right.
Tom
April 26, 2016 at 8:47 am
TomThomson (4/26/2016)
Nice question. Just one small problem.Either the answer is wrong or the question is badly worded. The question asks how many files, but the answer tells us how many data files and doesn't count the log file. I think most people, given the options provided, will realise that its the number of data files that's wanted and so ought to get it right.
good catch, Tom. I've edited the question to note "data files".
April 26, 2016 at 10:06 am
It can still change in the release version... 😉
Thanks, Steve!
April 26, 2016 at 10:54 am
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (4/26/2016)
TomThomson (4/26/2016)
Nice question. Just one small problem.Either the answer is wrong or the question is badly worded. The question asks how many files, but the answer tells us how many data files and doesn't count the log file. I think most people, given the options provided, will realise that its the number of data files that's wanted and so ought to get it right.
good catch, Tom. I've edited the question to note "data files".
I must admit that I didn't consider the log file when thinking about the question. Really good catch.
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply