July 20, 2016 at 11:03 pm
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Target Recovery Interval and Indirect Checkpoint
Igor Micev,My blog: www.igormicev.com
July 21, 2016 at 6:16 am
Nice article.
Do you plan on continued testing with different workloads and time frames? Will you publish those results as well?
412-977-3526 call/text
July 21, 2016 at 6:33 am
robert.sterbal 56890 (7/21/2016)
Nice article.Do you plan on continued testing with different workloads and time frames? Will you publish those results as well?
The workload is pretty much similar during the day, so I could not experiment with quite different workloads on my staging.
The changes are already done on my production environments and I'm satisfied from the improvement. I got similar results on production because we use the same feed (live) there as well.
I'll continue this work with another client that has bigger databases (300 GBs+) so I'll publish other results too, but some time later.
Igor Micev,My blog: www.igormicev.com
July 22, 2016 at 9:32 am
As robert.sterbal 56890 asked for extra screens from perfmon.exe, I'm doing that again. Now for a 500GB database on a server with even faster disks (15K rpm). The gain is similar as the one in the article.
Before changing TARGET_RECOVERY_TIME:
After changing TARGET_RECOVERY_TIME:
Igor Micev,My blog: www.igormicev.com
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply